Date of Decision: March 17, 2022
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession: Actor
Field: Acting
Nationality: Chinese
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
- Awards: The petitioner received several awards; however, the awards did not demonstrate sustained national acclaim.
- Published Material: Submitted one qualifying article and ten other articles that indicated some media recognition.
- Judging: Participated in judging at the China Film Performing Arts Institute in 2015.
Criteria Not Met:
- Membership in Associations: Membership in the China Theatre Association was not indicative of sustained national acclaim or reserved for those at the very top of the field.
Key Points from the Decision
Awards and Prizes Won:
The petitioner’s awards did not demonstrate sustained national acclaim or indicate that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Published Materials About the Petitioner:
The petitioner submitted limited media coverage, which did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim. The petitioner argued he could have provided more reports if required.
Original Contributions of Major Significance:
Not specifically addressed as met in the decision.
Participation as a Judge:
The single instance of judging in 2015 did not show the petitioner as being among the small percentage at the very top of the field.
Membership in Associations:
Membership in the China Theatre Association did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.
Authorship of Scholarly Articles:
Not specifically addressed as met in the decision.
Leading or Critical Role Performed:
Not specifically addressed as met in the decision.
Artistic Exhibitions or Showcases:
Not specifically addressed as met in the decision.
Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration:
Not specifically addressed as met in the decision.
Commercial Successes in the Performing Arts:
Not specifically addressed as met in the decision.
Supporting Documentation
- Awards Documentation: Summary of various awards received by the petitioner.
- Media Articles: Ten articles reflecting some media recognition.
- Judging Experience: Evidence of judging at the China Film Performing Arts Institute in 2015.
- Membership Evidence: Documentation of membership in the China Theatre Association.
Conclusion
Final Determination: Denied
Reasoning: The petitioner did not establish sustained national or international acclaim or demonstrate that he is among the small percentage at the very top of the field. The petitioner also did not show that the decision was based on an incorrect application of law or policy.
Next Steps: The petitioner may consider gathering additional evidence or exploring other visa options.
Download the Full Petition Review Here
Cite as Matter of G-M-, ID# 19865708
Document: MAR172022_01B2203
