Date of Decision: JUNE 25, 2019
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession: Architect
Field: Architecture, specifically in restoration of historic buildings
Nationality: Romanian
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
- Lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards: Evidence showed participation in teams that received awards for historic building restorations.
Criteria Not Met:
- Published material about the individual: The provided materials were not specifically about the petitioner or his individual contributions.
- Artistic exhibitions or showcases: Display of work did not clearly identify the petitioner’s work or establish it as part of an artistic exhibition.
- Leading or critical role: Evidence did not conclusively demonstrate that the petitioner played a leading or critical role in organizations with a distinguished reputation.
Key Points from the Decision
Published Materials About the Petitioner:
- The petitioner’s involvement in restoration projects was documented but not in a manner that highlighted his personal contributions or achievements.
Leading or critical role performed:
- Although the petitioner was recognized as valuable by his employers and colleagues, there was no strong evidence of a leading or critical role in any major projects or organizations.
Supporting Documentation
- Letters from employers and project managers regarding team awards.
- Web pages and magazine excerpts detailing restoration projects.
- Documents from academic institutions related to the petitioner’s education and exhibitions.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal was dismissed as the petitioner did not meet the necessary criteria for classification as an individual of extraordinary ability. The evidence provided was insufficient to demonstrate extraordinary ability in the field of architecture according to USCIS standards.
Reasoning:
- The evidence did not support a level of acclaim or professional standing necessary for the extraordinary ability classification.
Next Steps:
- Further documentation emphasizing individual achievements and roles in significant projects may be required for a successful reapplication or appeal.
