EB-1 Extraordinary Ability USCIS Appeal Review – Artist and Arts Teacher – APR162019_03B2203

Date of Decision: APR. 16, 2019
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability

Petitioner Information

Profession: Artist and art teacher
Field: Arts
Nationality: Not specified

Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied

Evidentiary Criteria Analysis

Criteria Met:

Display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases:
The Petitioner’s work was displayed at exhibitions in Russia. This evidence fulfills the criterion under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(vii).

Criteria Not Met:

Membership in associations:
The Petitioner’s membership in the Russian art association does not meet the criterion because it lacks evidence of requiring “outstanding achievements” of its members.

Original contributions of major significance:
The letters of support discussing the Petitioner’s unique glass painting techniques and arts education programs were not sufficient to demonstrate contributions of major significance in the field.

Performing in a leading or critical role:
The Petitioner did not provide adequate evidence that her roles in various organizations were leading or critical.


Key Points from the Decision

Awards and Prizes Won:

Not applicable.

Published Materials About the Petitioner:

Not applicable.

Original Contributions of Major Significance:

While the Petitioner has unique techniques in glass painting and has contributed to arts education, there is insufficient evidence to show these contributions are of major significance.

Participation as a Judge:

Not applicable.

Membership in Associations:

The Petitioner’s membership in the Russian art association does not demonstrate outstanding achievements required by the criterion.

Authorship of scholarly articles:

Not applicable.

Leading or critical role performed:

The roles mentioned by the Petitioner do not fulfill the requirement of being leading or critical.

Artistic Exhibitions or Showcases:

The Petitioner’s work was displayed at artistic exhibitions in Russia.

Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration:

Not applicable.

Commercial successes in the Performing Arts:

Not applicable.

Supporting Documentation

  • Membership Card: Russian art association membership card and bylaws.
  • Exhibition Records: Evidence of participation in exhibitions in Russia.
  • Letters of Support: Letters from colleagues and experts discussing the Petitioner’s work and contributions.
  • Educational Program Documentation: Details of arts education programs conducted by the Petitioner.

Conclusion

Final Determination: Appeal dismissed.
Reasoning: The Petitioner did not meet the required three criteria for EB-1 classification as an individual of extraordinary ability. The evidence provided was insufficient to demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.
Next Steps: The Petitioner may consider gathering more comprehensive and compelling evidence that aligns with the required criteria before reapplying.

Download the Full Petition Review Here

Igbo Stanford
Igbo Stanford

AI enthusiast, writer, and web designer.

Articles: 682

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *