Date of Decision: APR. 15, 2019
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession: Assistant Professor
Field: Neurological Surgery
Nationality: Not specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Sustained
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
Judging: The Petitioner has reviewed over 50 manuscripts for various prestigious professional publications.
Original Contributions: Notable advancements in neurosurgery, specifically in deep brain stimulation surgery, with several significant impacts on the field.
Scholarly Articles: Authored numerous impactful scholarly articles with high citation rates, indicating a strong recognition in the scientific community.
Criteria Not Met:
N/A – The appeal document does not detail specific criteria that were not met, focusing instead on the criteria satisfied and the overall merits of the case.
Key Points from the Decision
Awards and Prizes Won:
None specified directly, but the decision emphasizes sustained recognition and high impact in the field.
Published Materials About the Petitioner:
The petitioner has published a significant amount of scholarly articles and a book chapter, which have been extensively cited, demonstrating a high impact in the field of neurological surgery.
Original Contributions of Major Significance:
Contributions to deep brain stimulation surgery, such as improving electrode placement and surgery anesthetics, have been described as breakthroughs by peers.
Participation as a Judge:
Reviewed numerous manuscripts and served on editorial boards, reflecting his standing in the scientific community.
Membership in Associations:
Not specified in the document.
Authorship of Scholarly Articles:
The petitioner’s scholarly articles have been cited extensively, reflecting the profound impact and recognition of his work in the medical and academic communities.
Leading or Critical Role Performed:
Held a leading role in significant research projects and trials, notably in non-surgical treatments for neurological disorders.
Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration:
Not discussed in the decision.
Commercial Successes in the Performing Arts:
Not applicable.
Supporting Documentation
- Scholarly articles and citation reports
- Recommendation letters from peers and notable experts in the field
- Evidence of participation in editorial duties and manuscript reviews
- Documentation of research impact and usage by other institutions
Conclusion
Final Determination: The Petitioner meets the criteria for classification as an individual of extraordinary ability due to his sustained national and international acclaim and his recognized achievements in neurological surgery.
Reasoning: The Petitioner’s contributions to his field are well-documented and highly regarded by his peers, meeting the rigorous standards required for this classification.
Next Steps: Continue advancing in the field of neurological surgery and maintaining a high level of contribution and recognition.
