Date of Decision: August 19, 2022
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability

Petitioner Information

Profession: Business Executive
Field: Fitness Equipment Industry
Nationality: [Not Specified]

Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied

Evidentiary Criteria Analysis

Criteria Met:

The petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence to meet any of the criteria.

Criteria Not Met:

One-time achievement (a major, internationally recognized award):
The petitioner did not provide evidence of a one-time achievement of a major, internationally recognized award.

Receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards:
No evidence provided.

Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements:
No evidence provided.

Published material about the petitioner:
No evidence provided.

Participation as a judge of the work of others:
No evidence provided.

Original contributions of major significance:
No evidence provided.

Authorship of scholarly articles:
No evidence provided.

Leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation:
No evidence provided.

High salary or other significantly high remuneration:
No evidence provided.

Commercial successes in the performing arts:
No evidence provided.

Key Points from the Decision

Awards and Prizes Won:

  • Summary of findings: No awards or prizes were documented.

Published Materials About the Petitioner:

  • Summary of findings: No published materials were documented.

Original Contributions of Major Significance:

  • Summary of findings: No original contributions were documented.

Participation as a Judge:

  • Summary of findings: No participation as a judge was documented.

Membership in Associations:

  • Summary of findings: No memberships in associations were documented.

Authorship of Scholarly Articles:

  • Summary of findings: No scholarly articles were documented.

Leading or Critical Role Performed:

  • Summary of findings: No leading or critical roles were documented.

Artistic Exhibitions or Showcases:

Not applicable

Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration:

  • Summary of findings: No evidence of high salary or remuneration was documented.

Commercial Successes in the Performing Arts:

Not applicable

Supporting Documentation

No supporting documents were provided to meet the evidentiary criteria.

Conclusion

Final Determination: The appeal is dismissed.
Reasoning: The petitioner did not respond to the Notice of Intent to Dismiss, which was issued due to derogatory information found during routine verification checks. The information contradicted the petitioner’s claims of sustained employment and recognition in the fitness equipment industry.
Next Steps: The petitioner may consider reapplying with accurate and comprehensive documentation to support the petition.

Download the Full Petition Review Here


Izu Okafor
Izu Okafor

Izu Okafor is a filmmaker, project manager, and video editor with a rich background in the film industry. He has refined his craft under the mentorship of industry giants like AMAA VFx Winner Stephen Onaji Onche and AMVCA-winning producer Chris Odeh. Izu is one of 60 participants in the prestigious British Council Film Lab Africa Accelerator Program. His experience spans roles at Sixar Studio, Sozo Films, and Hanuluo Studios, with work on projects like "Wahala" and "Chiugo." He recently produced his debut feature, "Dinobi," which has garnered international festival recognition. Beyond filmmaking, Izu is dedicated to social entrepreneurship and youth empowerment, mentoring future leaders through Uncommon Me International.

Articles: 448

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *