Date of Decision: November 14, 2016
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession: College Lecturer in Accounting and Business Management
Field: Accounting and Business Management
Nationality: China
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Approved
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
- Judge of the Work of Others:
The Petitioner has served as a peer-reviewer for manuscripts and grants. He reviewed manuscripts for multiple journals and annual meetings, and was invited to serve as a discussant of another researcher’s presented paper at a conference. He also reviewed grant proposals for a research foundation. - Authorship of Published Material:
The Petitioner has authored several scholarly articles. His work has been widely cited, particularly in China, where his articles have been referenced by many scholars in the field of corporate governance and company administrators. His published work has inspired many Chinese companies to implement accounting systems, showcasing his influence in the field. - Leading or Critical Role:
The Petitioner served as a member of a research foundation and was one of its directors. He reviewed research proposals for funding approval, contributed to the development of promotional plans, and translated products into Chinese. His role was deemed critical to the foundation’s mission of supporting timely research in accounting and financial management.
Criteria Not Met:
None explicitly mentioned as not met.
Key Points from the Decision
Awards and Prizes Won:
No specific awards or prizes were highlighted.
Published Materials About the Petitioner:
The Petitioner’s work has been cited widely, particularly in China, supporting the recognition of his achievements in the field.
Original Contributions of Major Significance:
His published articles have influenced corporate governance practices in China, demonstrating the significance of his contributions.
Participation as a Judge:
The Petitioner’s role as a peer-reviewer for multiple journals and grant proposals indicates his recognition as an authority in his field.
Membership in Associations:
The Petitioner is a member of a worldwide association with a distinguished reputation, further underscoring his recognition in the field.
Authorship of Scholarly Articles:
The Petitioner’s articles have been widely cited and have influenced practices in China, supporting the recognition of his expertise.
Leading or Critical Role Performed:
The Petitioner’s role as a director in a research foundation was critical to its mission, showcasing his leadership and impact in the field.
Artistic Exhibitions or Showcases:
Not applicable.
Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration:
Not explicitly mentioned.
Commercial Successes in the Performing Arts:
Not applicable.
Supporting Documentation
- Reference Letters: Letters from various professionals attesting to the Petitioner’s contributions and roles.
- Evidence of Peer-Reviewing: Documentation of the Petitioner’s peer-reviewing activities for journals and grant proposals.
- Published Articles: Copies of the Petitioner’s articles and citation records.
- Role Descriptions: Descriptions of the Petitioner’s roles and contributions in various organizations.
Conclusion
Final Determination: Approved
Reasoning:
The Petitioner met the necessary criteria by demonstrating sustained national or international acclaim and recognition in his field. His work as a peer-reviewer, author, and leader in research foundations established his extraordinary ability. The appeal was sustained based on the totality of the evidence provided.
Next Steps:
The Petitioner should continue to document his achievements and contributions in his field to maintain his recognition and support any future immigration applications.
