Date of Decision: March 8, 2022
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession: Cricket Official and Administrator
Field: Sports Administration
Nationality: [Not Specified]
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
None
Criteria Not Met:
Membership in Associations:
The petitioner provided evidence of his membership with the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) Panel of Scorers. However, it was determined that membership in the BCCI Panel of Scorers did not meet the regulatory criteria because the membership requirements were based on passing examinations rather than being judged by recognized national or international experts for outstanding achievements.
Participation as a Judge:
The petitioner claimed eligibility based on his role as an umpire in USA Cricket exhibitions. However, the duties of a cricket umpire were found not to involve evaluating or judging the work of other cricket judges or competitors. Instead, their role focuses on enforcing the rules of a match and ensuring sportsmanlike competition.
Key Points from the Decision
Awards and Prizes Won:
Not applicable.
Published Materials About the Petitioner:
Not applicable.
Original Contributions of Major Significance:
Not applicable.
Participation as a Judge:
The petitioner failed to provide evidence that his role as an umpire involved judging the work of others in the same or an allied field of specialization, as required by the regulatory criteria.
Membership in Associations:
The petitioner’s membership with BCCI Panel of Scorers did not meet the necessary criteria, as it was based on passing examinations and not judged by recognized experts.
Authorship of Scholarly Articles:
Not applicable.
Leading or Critical Role Performed:
Not applicable.
Artistic Exhibitions or Showcases:
Not applicable.
Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration:
Not applicable.
Commercial Successes in the Performing Arts:
Not applicable.
Supporting Documentation
- Membership with BCCI Panel of Scorers:
Provided evidence of passing the Examination for Statisticians and Scorers and BCCI’s rules and regulations. However, the evidence did not meet the regulatory criteria for membership judged by recognized experts. - Role as Umpire in USA Cricket:
Provided background information about cricket umpires’ roles. However, it did not demonstrate judging the work of others in the field.
Conclusion
Final Determination: Appeal Dismissed
Reasoning:
The petitioner did not satisfy the required evidentiary criteria for demonstrating extraordinary ability. Membership in the BCCI Panel of Scorers was based on examinations rather than recognition by experts, and the role of a cricket umpire did not involve judging the work of others as required.
Next Steps:
The petitioner should consider re-evaluating the evidence and criteria for extraordinary ability and may seek further documentation or expert opinions to support the claim. Consulting with an immigration attorney specialized in EB-1 petitions may provide additional guidance for a future petition.
Download the Full Petition Review Here
