EB-1 Extraordinary Ability USCIS Appeal Review – Director – DEC272017_01B2203

Date of Decision: December 27, 2017
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability

Petitioner Information

Profession: Director
Field: Art
Nationality: Not specified

Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied

Evidentiary Criteria Analysis

Criteria Met:

The appeal did not proceed to a detailed analysis of the criteria because it was summarily dismissed due to procedural reasons.

Criteria Not Met:

The petitioner’s appeal did not provide a statement identifying any specific erroneous conclusion of law or fact in the Director’s decision, which led to the summary dismissal of the appeal.

Key Points from the Decision

Awards and Prizes Won:

Not applicable due to the summary dismissal.

Published Materials About the Petitioner:

Not applicable due to the summary dismissal.

Original Contributions of Major Significance:

Not applicable due to the summary dismissal.

Participation as a Judge:

Not applicable due to the summary dismissal.

Membership in Associations:

Not applicable due to the summary dismissal.

Authorship of Scholarly Articles:

Not applicable due to the summary dismissal.

Leading or Critical Role Performed:

Not applicable due to the summary dismissal.

Artistic Exhibitions or Showcases:

Not applicable due to the summary dismissal.

Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration:

Not applicable due to the summary dismissal.

Commercial Successes in the Performing Arts:

Not applicable due to the summary dismissal.

Supporting Documentation

  • Statement of Appeal: The petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically identified an erroneous conclusion of law or fact.
  • Form I-290B: The petitioner stated that a brief or additional evidence would be submitted within 30 days of filing, but nothing further was received.

Conclusion

Final Determination: The appeal was summarily dismissed.
Reasoning: The petitioner failed to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director’s decision. Additionally, no further evidence or brief was submitted within the specified timeframe.
Next Steps: The petitioner should consider reapplying with a detailed statement and additional evidence to support the appeal, or explore other visa categories that may better suit their qualifications and achievements.

Download the Full Petition Review Here


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *