Date of Decision: APR. 26, 2017
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession: Horse Breeder
Field: Thoroughbred Horse Breeding
Nationality: Not specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Approved
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
Participation as a Judge of the work of others:
The Petitioner provided letters showing that he evaluates thoroughbred horses for those wishing to purchase them. Therefore, he has met the criterion of participating as a judge of the work of others in his field.
Original Contributions:
The Petitioner has made significant contributions to the thoroughbred horse racing community by breeding several champion horses. This demonstrates his original contributions of major significance in the field.
Published Material:
The Petitioner provided evidence showing interviews by UK horse racing dignitaries after one of his horses won a race. The interview was broadcasted live and seen by millions, fulfilling the criterion of having published material about the alien in major media.
Criteria Not Met:
No additional criteria beyond the three already mentioned were analyzed or found not met in the document.
Key Points from the Decision
Published Materials About the Petitioner:
The Petitioner was interviewed by major UK horse racing media after his horse’s victory. This interview qualifies as major media, demonstrating the widespread recognition of his achievements.
Original Contributions of Major Significance:
The Petitioner’s breeding of several champion horses, introduction of new bloodlines, and the success of his breeding programs have been widely recognized, establishing his significant contributions to the field.
Participation as a Judge:
The Petitioner’s role in evaluating thoroughbred horses for purchase demonstrates his expertise and judgment, fulfilling the criterion of participating as a judge of the work of others.
Supporting Documentation
- Letters of Evaluation: Demonstrates Petitioner’s role in evaluating horses for purchase.
- Media Interviews: Includes details of interviews and broadcasts about Petitioner’s achievements.
- Breeding Records: Documents Petitioner’s successful breeding programs and the introduction of new bloodlines.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal is sustained.
Reasoning: The Petitioner has demonstrated extraordinary ability as a horse breeder through significant contributions to the field, participation as a judge, and widespread recognition in major media.
Next Steps: The Petitioner should continue to provide evidence of ongoing work in his field of expertise in the United States.
