Date of Decision: April 28, 2015
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession: Information Systems Specialist
Field: Information Systems
Nationality: Not specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Approved
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
Judging Criteria:
The petitioner has served as a reviewer for various publications and has been invited to serve on an editorial board.
Authorship of Scholarly Articles:
The petitioner has authored and published several scholarly articles in highly respected journals.
Original Contributions of Major Significance:
The petitioner’s research on information (preference) markets and Internet-based ‘wisdom of crowds’ has made an indelible impact in the field of information systems.
Criteria Not Met:
None specifically mentioned.
Key Points from the Decision
Awards and Prizes Won:
Not applicable in this case.
Published Materials About the Petitioner:
Several articles in well-known and highly ranked journals in the field of information systems have been published by the petitioner. These publications are highly respected in the field.
Original Contributions of Major Significance:
The petitioner’s research has led to significant business implementations and partnerships, including the commercialization of internet-connected sensors and appliances.
Participation as a Judge:
The petitioner has judged manuscripts for publication in top journals and has been invited to serve on an editorial board due to his research impact.
Membership in Associations:
Not applicable in this case.
Authorship of Scholarly Articles:
The petitioner has published numerous scholarly articles cited by other researchers, contributing significantly to the field.
Leading or Critical Role Performed:
Not applicable in this case.
Artistic Exhibitions or Showcases:
Not applicable in this case.
Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration:
Not applicable in this case.
Commercial Successes in the Performing Arts:
Not applicable in this case.
Supporting Documentation
- Editorial Board Membership Letters: Invitations to serve as an associate editor for respected publications.
- Published Scholarly Articles: Articles published in highly ranked journals.
- Letters of Support: From recognized professionals in the field, attesting to the significance of the petitioner’s contributions.
- Business Implementation Evidence: Documentation of companies using the petitioner’s research in their operations.
Conclusion
Final Determination:
The appeal is sustained, and the petition is approved.
Reasoning:
The petitioner demonstrated that he meets the criteria under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iv), (v), and (vi), proving his extraordinary ability in the field of information systems through original contributions and recognized publications.
Next Steps:
The petitioner may now continue his work in the United States in the field of information systems, which will prospectively benefit the country.
Download the Full Petition Review Here