Date of Decision: APR. 13, 2017
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession: Innovative Medical Business Strategist
Field: Business
Nationality: Not specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Dismissed
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met
None
Criteria Not Met
Documentation of the alien’s receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence in the field of endeavor:
The Petitioner presented a foreign language document claiming it reflected awards received. However, a properly certified English language translation was not submitted. Additionally, the submitted awards were related to dentistry and did not establish national or international recognition for excellence in medical business strategy.
Documentation of the alien’s membership in associations in the field which require outstanding achievements:
The Petitioner submitted evidence of membership in a dentistry association. However, it did not demonstrate that the association requires outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media:
The articles submitted were authored by the Petitioner and related to events, not specifically about the Petitioner’s work or achievements in the field of medical business strategy.
Evidence of the alien’s original contributions of major significance in the field:
The Petitioner provided a letter from a professor highlighting her skills. However, the documentation did not establish any original contributions of major significance to the field.
Evidence that the alien has performed in a leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation:
The Petitioner claimed a critical role during an internship. However, specific information on how her role was pivotal to the success of the organization was not provided.
Key Points from the Decision
Awards and Prizes Won
The Petitioner did not establish that the awards were nationally or internationally recognized for excellence.
Published Materials About the Petitioner
The submitted articles were about related events and not about the Petitioner’s specific contributions or recognition in the field.
Original Contributions of Major Significance
The documentation did not demonstrate any original contributions of major significance by the Petitioner.
Participation as a Judge
Not applicable.
Membership in Associations
The submitted evidence did not demonstrate that the memberships required outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.
Authorship of Scholarly Articles
Not applicable.
Leading or Critical Role Performed
The Petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate a leading or critical role in distinguished organizations.
Artistic Exhibitions or Showcases
Not applicable.
Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration
Not applicable.
Commercial Successes in the Performing Arts
Not applicable.
Supporting Documentation
The Petitioner submitted various documents, including awards, membership proofs, and letters of recommendation. However, these documents did not meet the required evidentiary standards.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal is dismissed.
Reasoning: The Petitioner did not satisfy any of the regulatory criteria for demonstrating extraordinary ability in her field.
Next Steps: The Petitioner may consider submitting additional evidence that meets the criteria or seek alternative visa classifications.
