Date of Decision: May 24, 2019
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession: International Legal Consultant
Field: Legal Consulting and Activism
Nationality: Not Specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Sustained
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
Published Material About the Petitioner: The petitioner demonstrated that his work has been featured in professional publications such as Commercial Dispute Resolution and Decideurs, which are tailored for legal and business professionals.
Participation as a Judge: Evidence confirmed the petitioner’s role on panels judging legal and tax competitions, acknowledging his expertise and influence in the field.
Authorship of Scholarly Articles: The petitioner provided articles published in recognized legal journals, showcasing his contributions to legal scholarship and discussions in professional circles.
Leading or Critical Role: The petitioner held significant roles in reputable organizations focused on legal consulting and combating online hate speech, establishing his leadership in these areas.
Criteria Not Met:
Original Contributions of Major Significance: The evidence provided did not conclusively prove that the petitioner’s contributions had a major significant impact on his field.
Key Points from the Decision
Awards and Prizes Won:
The decision did not specify particular awards or prizes, focusing instead on the petitioner’s professional roles and published works.
Published Materials About the Petitioner:
The petitioner’s engagement with the media, through professional publications and interviews, underlines recognition of his expertise and influence in the legal field.
Original Contributions of Major Significance:
While the petitioner’s efforts in policy drafting and advocacy were noted, there was insufficient evidence to conclusively establish these as major contributions to his field.
Participation as a Judge:
The petitioner’s involvement in judging professional competitions highlights his peer recognition and trusted expertise.
Membership in Associations:
The documentation does not discuss membership in formal associations.
Leading or Critical Role Performed:
His leadership in organizations combating hate speech and promoting legal consulting illustrates his critical role in these sectors.
Supporting Documentation
The petitioner submitted articles, interviews, evidence of his leadership roles, and details of his participation in panels, which collectively supported his appeal.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The petitioner has been determined to be an international legal consultant of extraordinary ability, fulfilling the necessary criteria to overturn the initial decision.
Reasoning:
The appeal was sustained based on the comprehensive evidence demonstrating the petitioner’s sustained acclaim and top-tier status in his field.
Next Steps:
The petitioner is advised to continue his impactful work in legal consulting and activism, further contributing to his field as he relocates to the United States.
