Date of Decision: SEPT. 11, 2015
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession:
Materials Chemistry Researcher
Field:
Materials Chemistry
Nationality:
India
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision:
Denied
Appeal Outcome:
Approved
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
Evidence of participation as a judge:
The Petitioner submitted documentation showing that she served as a peer reviewer for multiple journals, thus satisfying this criterion.
Evidence of original contributions of major significance:
The Petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence establishing her original scientific contributions in the field, supported by expert statements and extensive citations, demonstrating major significance.
Evidence of authorship of scholarly articles:
The Petitioner provided evidence of her authorship of scholarly articles in numerous professional journals, supporting the Director’s finding that this criterion was met.
Criteria Not Met:
None specified.
Key Points from the Decision
Awards and Prizes Won:
Not applicable.
Published Materials About the Petitioner:
Not applicable.
Original Contributions of Major Significance:
The Petitioner’s research in materials chemistry, specifically her work on surface enthalpy, water adsorption, and biogenic amorphous carbonate, was highlighted as having major significance. Experts cited her contributions as critical to advancements in her field and to meeting U.S. Department of Energy needs.
Participation as a Judge:
The Petitioner served as a peer reviewer for multiple journals, demonstrating her role in evaluating the work of others in her field.
Membership in Associations:
Not applicable.
Authorship of Scholarly Articles:
The Petitioner authored a significant number of articles in distinguished journals and conference proceedings, garnering extensive citations that applied and built upon her work.
Leading or Critical Role Performed:
Not applicable.
Artistic Exhibitions or Showcases:
Not applicable.
Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration:
Not applicable.
Commercial Successes in the Performing Arts:
Not applicable.
Supporting Documentation
- Letters of Support: Provided by experts in the field, detailing the significance of the Petitioner’s original research contributions.
- Google Scholar Citation Reports: Demonstrated the extensive citation and influence of the Petitioner’s work.
- Peer Review Documentation: Evidence of the Petitioner’s role as a peer reviewer for multiple journals.
- Published Articles: Copies of the Petitioner’s scholarly articles in various professional journals.
Conclusion
Final Determination:
The Petitioner met the evidentiary criteria for classification as an EB1 Extraordinary Ability alien, demonstrating sustained national and international acclaim in the field of materials chemistry.
Reasoning:
The Petitioner’s extensive documentation of her achievements, including her original contributions, peer review activities, and scholarly articles, established her as one of the top individuals in her field with recognized national and international acclaim.
Next Steps:
The Petitioner should continue her work in the United States, contributing to advancements in materials chemistry and related fields.
