Date of Decision: MAY 8, 2019
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession: Medical Doctor, Researcher, and Professor
Field: Pediatrics and Public Health
Nationality: Colombian
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Approved
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
Criterion 1: Participation as a judge of the work of others in the field – The Petitioner reviewed manuscripts for professional publications like Pediatrics and the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.
Criterion 2: Authorship of scholarly articles – Authored multiple scholarly articles, including publications in Acta Paediatrica and The BMJ.
Criterion 3: Leading or critical role in distinguished organizations – Played a key role at a top university in Colombia, significantly impacting public health projects and educational programs.
Criteria Not Met:
No specific criteria were identified as not met, as the decision focused on the criteria satisfied.
Key Points from the Decision
Awards and Prizes Won:
The petitioner has received numerous awards, including a biannual award for lifetime achievements in health sciences research.
Original Contributions of Major Significance:
The petitioner’s research in infant care significantly influenced health standards in Colombia and had a global impact, forming the basis of WHO guidelines.
Participation as a Judge:
Reviewed work for notable journals in the medical field, reinforcing his standing in the field.
Authorship of Scholarly Articles:
Published extensively in reputed journals, significantly contributing to the field of pediatrics and public health with over 3,100 citations.
Leading or Critical Role Performed:
Held pivotal roles in educational and public health initiatives at major institutions, contributing to significant advances in health care practices and policies.
Supporting Documentation
The petitioner submitted extensive documentation, including peer-reviewed articles, reference letters from leading experts and professors, and evidence of awards and foundational roles in non-profit organizations.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal is approved, affirming the petitioner’s status as an individual of extraordinary ability.
Reasoning: The petitioner has demonstrated sustained national and international acclaim and stands among the top in his field through extensive contributions and recognitions.
Next Steps: The petitioner should continue his work in the U.S., contributing to advancements in public health and pediatrics.