EB-1 Extraordinary Ability USCIS Appeal Review – Musician from Venezuela – OCT092019_01B2203

Date of Decision: OCT. 9, 2019
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability

Petitioner Information

Profession: Musician
Field: Arts
Nationality: Venezuela

Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Remanded

Evidentiary Criteria Analysis

Criteria Met:

  • Awards: The Petitioner claimed recognition for national or international awards. He presented evidence of receiving an individual award certificate along with the statuette awarded to his band in Venezuela.
  • Published Materials: Evidence was provided showcasing published materials about the Petitioner.
  • Original Contributions: The Petitioner demonstrated original contributions of major significance in his field.
  • Membership in Associations: The Petitioner showed membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements.

Criteria Not Met:

  • Judge Participation: The Petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence of participating as a judge of the work of others.
  • High Salary: Insufficient evidence was presented to prove that the Petitioner received a high salary compared to others in the field.

Key Points from the Decision

Awards and Prizes Won:

  • Summary of Findings: The Petitioner provided documentation of an individual award certificate and statuette from a recognized national award in Venezuela.
  • Key Quotes or References: “The Petitioner claimed that the Director incorrectly determined he was not ‘officially credited’ for a nationally recognized award.”

Published Materials About the Petitioner:

  • Summary of Findings: Materials published about the Petitioner were presented, supporting his recognition in the field.
  • Key Quotes or References: Not explicitly quoted in the document.

Original Contributions of Major Significance:

  • Summary of Findings: The Petitioner demonstrated significant contributions to the arts.
  • Key Quotes or References: Not explicitly quoted in the document.

Membership in Associations:

  • Summary of Findings: The Petitioner proved membership in associations that require outstanding achievements of their members.
  • Key Quotes or References: Not explicitly quoted in the document.

Supporting Documentation

  • Individual Award Certificate and Statuette: Documentation showing recognition at a national level in Venezuela.
  • Published Articles: Articles and materials showcasing the Petitioner’s work and recognition.
  • Association Memberships: Evidence of membership in notable associations in the field of arts.

Conclusion

Final Determination: The decision of the Director is withdrawn. The matter is remanded for the entry of a new decision.

Reasoning: The Director did not fully address the Petitioner’s motion to reopen or reconsider. The analysis was insufficient, and key arguments were not evaluated.

Next Steps: The Director must evaluate the Petitioner’s claims and new facts, addressing them comprehensively in the new decision.

Download the Full Petition Review Here

Igbo Stanford
Igbo Stanford

AI enthusiast, writer, and web designer.

Articles: 682

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *