Date of Decision: FEB. 9, 2016
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession: Policy Analyst
Field: Sciences
Nationality: Not Specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Sustained
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
- Participation as a Judge: The petitioner demonstrated participation as a judge of the work of others in the same field, specifically by serving on the editorial board and refereeing manuscripts for publication.
- Original Contributions of Major Significance: The petitioner provided evidence of significant original contributions to the field, including impactful reports and research recognized by industry leaders.
- Authorship of Scholarly Articles: The petitioner has authored scholarly articles in the field, contributing to academic journals.
Criteria Not Met:
- Specific criteria not met were not detailed in the decision.
Key Points from the Decision
Original Contributions of Major Significance:
- The petitioner’s contributions, including studies and papers on the future of Africa, are described as original and significant works in the field.
Participation as a Judge:
- Recognition was given for the petitioner’s role on the editorial board of a respected journal, enhancing his professional standing.
Membership in Associations:
- The petitioner was selected as one of 30 inaugural members of a prestigious committee, indicating recognition at an international level.
Supporting Documentation
- Letters of recommendation from experts.
- Documentation of membership on editorial boards and associations.
- Published scholarly articles and research papers.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal is sustained based on the petitioner’s demonstrated extraordinary ability in the field of policy analysis, particularly concerning strategic planning and future foresight in Africa. The petitioner has met the evidentiary criteria by demonstrating sustained national or international acclaim.
Reasoning: The appeal was sustained following a comprehensive review which confirmed that the petitioner met the necessary criteria and has made significant contributions to his field.
Next Steps: Continue advancement in current research and professional engagements to maintain and enhance standing in the field.
