Date of Decision: February 28, 2018
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession: Postdoctoral Research Associate
Field: Neuroscience
Nationality: Not specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Approved
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
Judging the work of others
The petitioner has reviewed manuscripts for several professional publications, demonstrating recognition of expertise.
Original contributions of major significance
The petitioner has made significant contributions in neuroscience, particularly in understanding brain functions related to abstract information and consciousness.
Authorship of scholarly articles
The petitioner has authored multiple scholarly articles that have been published in professional journals and cited by peers, indicating influence and recognition in the field.
Criteria Not Met:
None was stated.
Key Points from the Decision
Awards and Prizes Won:
Not specifically highlighted in the document.
Published Materials About the Petitioner:
The petitioner’s work has been published in several professional journals and has been cited frequently, indicating sustained national or international acclaim.
Original Contributions of Major Significance:
The petitioner has made groundbreaking contributions to neuroscience, which have been recognized and utilized by peers in the field.
Participation as a Judge:
The petitioner has served as a peer reviewer for numerous professional publications, demonstrating recognition of expertise and influence.
Membership in Associations:
Not specifically highlighted in the document.
Authorship of scholarly articles:
The petitioner has authored articles that are frequently cited, demonstrating significant impact on the field of neuroscience.
Leading or critical role performed:
Not specifically highlighted in the document.
Artistic Exhibitions or Showcases:
Not applicable to this case type.
Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration:
Not specifically highlighted in the document.
Commercial successes in the Performing Arts:
Not applicable to this case type.
Supporting Documentation
Manuscripts reviewed by the petitioner
Published articles and citation records
Recommendation letters from colleagues and peers in the field
Evidence of presentations at professional conferences
Co-authored book chapters
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal is sustained, and the petitioner qualifies for classification as an individual of extraordinary ability.
Reasoning:
The petitioner has demonstrated sustained national and international acclaim and is recognized as one of the small percentage at the very top of the field of neuroscience. The totality of evidence, including peer-reviewed publications, citation records, and letters of recommendation, supports this conclusion.
Next Steps:
The petitioner is eligible to enter the United States to continue work in the area of extraordinary ability, which will substantially benefit the United States.
