EB-1 Extraordinary Ability USCIS Appeal Review – Powerlifter – JUN072018_02B2203

Date of Decision: June 7, 2018
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability

Petitioner Information

Profession: Powerlifter
Field: Athletics
Nationality: Not specified

Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied

Evidentiary Criteria Analysis

Criteria Met:
Awards at 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(h)(3)(i):
The petitioner submitted evidence indicating he won gold and silver medals in the 2013 [competition], setting two world records for squat in his age and weight class. Additional awards include a fourth rank in the 2010 [competition], a Champion of Champions award at the 2014 [competition] in Iran, and gold medals at the 2016 [competition].

Published Material at 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(h)(3)(iii):
The record contains several articles published in the [newspaper] about the petitioner and his successes as a powerlifter. The petitioner provided evidence demonstrating that the [newspaper] is the third most popular newspaper in Iran with significant daily circulation.

Criteria Not Met:
Membership at 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(h)(3)(ii):
The petitioner asserted that he met this criterion due to his membership in the [organization] and [another organization]. However, the record did not support a finding that these organizations require outstanding achievements for membership. The provided constitution of the [organization] did not indicate that it required outstanding achievements for its members.

High Salary at 8 C.F.R. ยง 204.5(h)(3)(ix):
The petitioner submitted letters and affidavits regarding his remuneration as a professional powerlifter but was unable to demonstrate that he commanded a high salary. The record lacked information on income for powerlifters both in Iran and internationally.

Key Points from the Decision

Awards and Prizes Won:
The petitioner won multiple gold and silver medals in various international competitions, setting world records in his age and weight class.

Published Materials About the Petitioner:
Articles about the petitioner’s achievements were published in one of Iran’s most popular newspapers, meeting the criterion for published material in major media.

Original Contributions of Major Significance:
Not applicable based on the provided evidence.

Participation as a Judge:
Not applicable based on the provided evidence.

Membership in Associations:
The petitioner was a member of several organizations, but these memberships did not require outstanding achievements.

Authorship of Scholarly Articles:
Not applicable based on the provided evidence.

Leading or Critical Role Performed:
Not applicable based on the provided evidence.

Artistic Exhibitions or Showcases:
Not applicable.

Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration:
The petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence to demonstrate a high salary or significantly high remuneration in relation to others in his field.

Commercial Successes in the Performing Arts:
Not applicable.

Supporting Documentation

The petitioner provided several pieces of evidence, including:

Evidence of winning multiple medals and setting world records in international competitions.
Articles published in major Iranian newspapers about his achievements.
Letters and affidavits regarding his remuneration as a professional powerlifter.
Constitution of the [organization] and membership details.

Conclusion

Final Determination:
The appeal is dismissed.

Reasoning:
The petitioner did not submit the required initial evidence of either a qualifying one-time achievement or documentation that meets at least three of the ten criteria listed. Consequently, the petitioner failed to establish eligibility for the benefit sought.

Next Steps:
The petitioner may consider consulting with new legal counsel to explore any further options for appeal or other immigration benefits for which he may be eligible.

Download the Full Petition Review Here

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *