Date of Decision: January 28, 2022
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability

Petitioner Information

Profession: Professional Tennis Coach
Field: Tennis Coaching
Nationality: [Not Specified]

Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Remanded

Evidentiary Criteria Analysis

Criteria Met:

Awards and Prizes Won: The petitioner provided evidence of the beneficiary’s national and international recognition through sustained acclaim in the tennis coaching field.

Published Materials About the Petitioner: Documentation included articles and publications highlighting the beneficiary’s achievements and contributions to tennis coaching.

Original Contributions of Major Significance: Evidence was submitted showcasing the beneficiary’s innovative coaching techniques and contributions to the advancement of tennis coaching.

Participation as a Judge: The beneficiary’s participation as a judge in significant tennis tournaments was documented.

Membership in Associations: The petitioner demonstrated the beneficiary’s membership in distinguished tennis coaching associations.

Authorship of Scholarly Articles: The beneficiary authored several scholarly articles on advanced tennis coaching techniques.

    Criteria Not Met:

    High Salary or Remuneration: The petitioner did not sufficiently demonstrate that the beneficiary’s salary was significantly higher than that of others in the field.

      Key Points from the Decision

      Awards and Prizes Won:

      The evidence indicated that the beneficiary received recognition and awards at national and international levels, confirming his extraordinary ability in tennis coaching.

      Published Materials About the Petitioner:

      The petitioner included articles from reputable sources detailing the beneficiary’s professional journey, achievements, and impact on tennis coaching.

      Original Contributions of Major Significance:

      The beneficiary’s innovative coaching methods and contributions to tennis coaching were highlighted, establishing his major significance in the field.

      Participation as a Judge:

      Documentation of the beneficiary’s role as a judge in prominent tennis tournaments was provided, demonstrating his expert status and recognition in the field.

      Membership in Associations:

      The petitioner demonstrated that the beneficiary held memberships in several prestigious tennis coaching associations, reflecting his standing in the professional community.

      Authorship of Scholarly Articles:

      The beneficiary’s scholarly articles on tennis coaching were provided, showing his contributions to the knowledge base and advancement of the field.

      Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration:

      The petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove that the beneficiary’s salary was significantly higher than others in the field.

      Commercial Successes in Performing Arts:

      This criterion was not relevant or adequately supported by the evidence presented.

      Supporting Documentation

      1. Awards Certificates: Detailed descriptions and copies of awards and certificates received by the beneficiary.
      2. Published Articles: Copies of articles and publications featuring the beneficiary.
      3. Contribution Evidence: Documentation of the beneficiary’s contributions to tennis coaching innovations.
      4. Judging Participation: Records of the beneficiary’s participation as a judge in tennis tournaments.
      5. Association Memberships: Proof of memberships in tennis coaching associations.
      6. Scholarly Articles: Copies of scholarly articles authored by the beneficiary.

      Conclusion

      Final Determination: Remanded

      Reasoning: The Director’s decision was withdrawn due to insufficient explanation and analysis of the petitioner’s arguments. The case was remanded for further review and a new decision. The petitioner demonstrated substantial evidence for several criteria but lacked sufficient proof for others, such as high salary and commercial success.

      Next Steps: The petitioner should prepare additional evidence to support the criteria that were not met, particularly focusing on demonstrating the beneficiary’s high salary and any commercial successes.

      Download the Full Petition Review Here

      Izu Okafor
      Izu Okafor

      Izu Okafor is a filmmaker, project manager, and video editor with a rich background in the film industry. He has refined his craft under the mentorship of industry giants like AMAA VFx Winner Stephen Onaji Onche and AMVCA-winning producer Chris Odeh. Izu is one of 60 participants in the prestigious British Council Film Lab Africa Accelerator Program. His experience spans roles at Sixar Studio, Sozo Films, and Hanuluo Studios, with work on projects like "Wahala" and "Chiugo." He recently produced his debut feature, "Dinobi," which has garnered international festival recognition. Beyond filmmaking, Izu is dedicated to social entrepreneurship and youth empowerment, mentoring future leaders through Uncommon Me International.

      Articles: 448

      Leave a Reply

      Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *