Date of Decision: May 16, 2024
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession: Public Relations Specialist
Field: Public Relations in Arts and Entertainment
Nationality: Not specified in the document
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Dismissed
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
- Judging the Work of Others: The petitioner demonstrated participation as a judge in evaluating projects in allied fields of public relations.
Criteria Not Met:
- Lesser Prizes or Awards: The petitioner submitted evidence of awards granted to her previous employer but did not demonstrate that she was the individual recipient or that the awards were nationally or internationally recognized.
- Membership in Associations: Membership evidence did not establish that the organizations required outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts.
- Published Material About the Petitioner: Submitted materials lacked proof of major media recognition, authorship details, or transcripts for radio interviews.
Key Points from the Decision
Judging the Work of Others:
The petitioner provided evidence of evaluating communication strategies, marketability, and public relations potential for artistic projects. The Director confirmed this criterion was satisfied based on the documentation provided.
Lesser Prizes or Awards:
The petitioner claimed awards from the Bulgarian Association of PR Agencies (BAPRA), but evidence showed the awards were granted to the employer rather than the individual. Additional evidence did not establish national or international recognition of the awards.
Membership in Associations:
The petitioner’s memberships, including those in the Bulgarian Public Relations Association (BPRA) and other organizations, did not require outstanding achievements judged by experts. Documentation provided was insufficient to meet the regulatory requirements.
Published Material About the Petitioner:
Radio interviews and an online article were submitted, but they lacked supporting transcripts, authorship details, and evidence of publication in major media or trade outlets.
Supporting Documentation
Judging Activities: Evidence of participation as a judge in artistic and entertainment projects.
Awards Documentation: Awards received by the employer, but not linked to individual recognition.
Memberships Evidence: Membership letters and criteria from organizations, none meeting the evidentiary standards for outstanding achievements.
Media Coverage: Articles and radio segments lacking critical details and sufficient prominence.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal was dismissed.
Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to meet at least three of the ten evidentiary criteria required under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3). The record did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim or recognition placing the petitioner among the small percentage at the top of her field.