Date of Decision: NOV. 14, 2016
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession: Medical Researcher
Field: Radiology
Nationality: [Not Specified]
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Approved
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
- Authorship of Scholarly Articles: The Petitioner authored several articles that have been recognized, well-cited, and referenced in national guidelines.
- Participation as a Judge of the Work of Others: The Petitioner served on an expert panel for self-assessments and continuing medical education courses.
- Original Contributions of Major Significance: The Petitioner’s work has been influential in radiology, particularly in creating guidelines for optimal CT imaging factors when evaluating suspected Mesenteric Ischemia (MI).
Criteria Not Met:
- None specified as unmet.
Key Points from the Decision
Awards and Prizes Won: Not applicable in this case.
Published Materials About the Petitioner:
The Petitioner’s articles have been published and recognized, contributing significantly to the field of radiology. His work has been cited in various national guidelines.
Original Contributions of Major Significance:
The Petitioner developed significant guidelines for CT imaging in suspected MI, and his research has been cited in multiple clinical guidelines.
Participation as a Judge:
The Petitioner served on expert panels for medical education and self-assessment courses, demonstrating his influence and recognition in the field.
Membership in Associations: Not specified in the document.
Authorship of Scholarly Articles:
The Petitioner has authored multiple scholarly articles that have been well-cited and incorporated into national guidelines.
Leading or Critical Role Performed: Not specified in the document.
Artistic Exhibitions or Showcases: Not applicable in this case.
Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration: Not specified in the document.
Commercial Successes in the Performing Arts: Not applicable in this case.
Supporting Documentation
- Reference Letters: Provided by several esteemed colleagues, attesting to the Petitioner’s significant contributions to radiology.
- Clinical Guidelines: Documents that incorporate the Petitioner’s research into national and international guidelines.
- Citation Records: Detailed citation records showing the impact of the Petitioner’s work.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal is sustained, and the petitioner’s classification as an individual of extraordinary ability is approved.
Reasoning:
The Petitioner provided comprehensive evidence of his extraordinary contributions to the field of radiology. His research has been influential, well-cited, and incorporated into key clinical guidelines.
Next Steps:
The Petitioner is to continue his work in the United States, benefiting the medical field with his expertise and contributions.
