EB-1 Extraordinary Ability USCIS Appeal Review – Research Scientist – MAY302019_02B2203

Date of Decision: MAY 30, 2019
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability

Petitioner Information

Profession: Research Scientist
Field: Data Science and Research in Open Science and Reproducible Research
Nationality: Not Specified

Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Approved

Evidentiary Criteria Analysis

Criteria Met:

Participation as a Judge: The petitioner has a significant record as a judge of the work of others, with roles including founding editor of a notable journal and associate editor for top-ranked publications.
Authorship of Scholarly Articles: Extensive authorship of scholarly articles in high-impact journals, frequently cited in the academic community.
Published Material About Petitioner: Recognition in prestigious journals such as Nature and Science, highlighting the petitioner’s contribution to the field.

Criteria Not Met:

Awards: Not established as having received major, internationally recognized awards.
Original Contributions of Major Significance: Not sufficiently evidenced in the initial petition.
Leading or Critical Role: The initial petition did not provide enough evidence to satisfy this criterion.

Key Points from the Decision

Awards and Prizes Won:

No major international awards were established, although the petitioner’s role in the scientific community is highly regarded.

Published Materials About the Petitioner:

Featured in internationally renowned journals such as Nature and Science, which are considered career milestones in the scientific community.

Original Contributions of Major Significance:

Developed tools and methodologies that have enabled broader access to scientific data, enhancing reproducibility and accountability in research across global challenges like climate change.

Participation as a Judge:

Served extensively as a peer reviewer and editor for multiple high-profile scientific journals, reinforcing his status at the peak of his field.

Membership in Associations:

Not specifically mentioned, but the petitioner’s editorial roles imply active membership in professional communities.

Authorship of Scholarly Articles:

The petitioner has a strong publication record with numerous citations, indicating sustained recognition by the academic community.

Leading or Critical Role Performed:

Played a key role in securing substantial funding for research, significantly impacting data science research and education at his institution.

Supporting Documentation

Included scholarly articles, letters of recognition from peers, and documentation of leadership in securing research funding.

Conclusion

Final Determination: The petitioner qualifies for the EB1 Extraordinary Ability category based on a sustained record of national and international acclaim.
Reasoning: The petitioner’s comprehensive impact and contributions to the field meet the high standards required for this visa category.
Next Steps: Continue contributions to the field; no further actions required unless new circumstances arise.

Download the Full Petition Review Here

Igbo Stanford
Igbo Stanford

AI enthusiast, writer, and web designer.

Articles: 682

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *