Date of Decision: NOV. 7, 2019
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession: Research Scientist
Field: Life Sciences, Neurodegenerative Diseases
Nationality: Not specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
1. Authorship of Scholarly Articles:
The petitioner satisfied this criterion by providing evidence of multiple scholarly articles published in professional or major trade publications.
2. Original Contributions of Major Significance:
The petitioner’s work on the signaling mechanism for the regulation of adult brain niches has been recognized as highly significant, particularly in the context of traumatic brain injury and neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.
Criteria Not Met:
1. Participation as a Judge:
Although the petitioner was a member of the editorial boards of two journals, there was no evidence to show actual participation as a judge of the work of others.
Key Points from the Decision
Awards and Prizes Won:
- Summary: No specific awards or prizes were cited in the decision.
Published Materials About the Petitioner:
- Summary: Letters from various researchers praised the petitioner’s research, particularly noting its importance in understanding brain regulation.
Original Contributions of Major Significance:
- Summary: The petitioner’s research contributions were noted for their potential therapeutic implications in neurodegenerative conditions.
Participation as a Judge:
- Summary: The petitioner’s role on editorial boards did not meet the criteria for judging the work of others due to lack of documented evidence.
Membership in Associations:
- Summary: Membership alone did not satisfy the criteria without evidence of acclaim or significant standing in the field.
Authorship of Scholarly Articles:
- Summary: The petitioner provided evidence of several scholarly articles, demonstrating contribution to the field.
Leading or Critical Role Performed:
- Summary: Not specifically addressed in the decision.
Artistic Exhibitions or Showcases:
- Summary: Not applicable.
Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration:
- Summary: Not addressed in the decision.
Commercial Successes in the Performing Arts:
- Summary: Not applicable.
Supporting Documentation
- Letters from Researchers: Highlighted the significance of the petitioner’s research and its potential therapeutic implications.
- Scholarly Articles: Provided documentation of published works in reputable journals.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal is dismissed.
Reasoning: The petitioner did not meet the required three criteria for extraordinary ability, and the evidence did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.
Next Steps: Consideration of further evidence or a new petition might be advisable if additional supporting documentation becomes available.
