Date of Decision: SEPT. 23, 2015
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession: Researcher
Field: Stem Cell Biology, Developmental Biology, and Neuroscience
Nationality: China
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Approved
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
Participation as a Judge:
The petitioner served as a peer reviewer for four scientific journals and evaluated grant applications for the Research Grants Council of the Special Administrative Region government.
Original Contributions of Major Significance:
The petitioner made significant discoveries relating to and remodelers, which have been recognized as major contributions in the field.
Authorship of Scholarly Articles:
The petitioner authored several scholarly articles in top-ranked journals, with substantial citations that indicate the importance and influence of the work.
Criteria Not Met:
The document does not mention criteria that were not met. The Director initially determined that the totality of evidence did not reflect extraordinary ability, but the appeal review concluded otherwise.
Key Points from the Decision
Awards and Prizes Won:
Not specifically mentioned in the document.
Published Materials About the Petitioner:
Not specifically mentioned in the document.
Original Contributions of Major Significance:
The petitioner’s discoveries in stem cell biology and neuroscience, particularly regarding the role of reactive oxygen species and remodelers, have opened new avenues for research and provided potential therapeutic targets.
Participation as a Judge:
The petitioner’s role as a peer reviewer for prestigious journals and grant applications demonstrates recognition of her expertise in the field.
Membership in Associations:
Not specifically mentioned in the document.
Authorship of Scholarly Articles:
The petitioner has published numerous articles in top-tier journals, which have been widely cited, highlighting the impact and recognition of her research.
Leading or Critical Role Performed:
Not specifically mentioned in the document.
Artistic Exhibitions or Showcases:
Not applicable.
Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration:
Not specifically mentioned in the document.
Commercial Successes in the Performing Arts:
Not applicable.
Supporting Documentation
- Peer Review Letters: Provided evidence of the petitioner’s role as a peer reviewer for four scientific journals.
- Research Contributions: Documented significant findings in the field of stem cell biology and neuroscience.
- Scholarly Articles: Authored articles in top-ranked journals with high citation counts.
- Reference Letters: Letters from peers and supervisors attesting to the petitioner’s contributions and recognition in the field.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The petitioner has demonstrated extraordinary ability in the field of stem cell biology, developmental biology, and neuroscience. The appeal is sustained, and the petitioner is eligible for the EB-1 classification.
Reasoning: The petitioner’s achievements have been recognized in her field, and she has shown sustained national and international acclaim. Her work has had a significant impact, evidenced by high citation counts and prestigious publications.
Next Steps: The petitioner should continue to document her contributions and maintain her high level of performance in her field.
