Date of Decision: December 3, 2021

Service Center: Nebraska Service Center

Form Type: Form I-140

Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability

Petitioner Information

Profession: Sound Editor and Designer

Field: Sound Editing and Design

Nationality: Not specified in the document

Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied

Appeal Outcome: Denied

Evidentiary Criteria Analysis

Criteria Met:

The document does not specify which criteria were met by the petitioner.

Criteria Not Met:

The document does not specify which criteria were not met by the petitioner, focusing instead on procedural issues.

Key Points from the Decision

Awards and Prizes Won:

The document does not provide details on awards or prizes won by the petitioner.

Published Materials About the Petitioner:

The document does not provide details on published materials about the petitioner.

Original Contributions of Major Significance:

The document does not provide details on original contributions of major significance by the petitioner.

Participation as a Judge:

The document does not provide details on the petitioner’s participation as a judge.

Membership in Associations:

The document does not provide details on the petitioner’s membership in associations.

Authorship of Scholarly Articles:

The document does not provide details on the authorship of scholarly articles by the petitioner.

Leading or Critical Role Performed:

The document does not provide details on leading or critical roles performed by the petitioner.

Artistic Exhibitions or Showcases:

The document does not provide details on artistic exhibitions or showcases involving the petitioner.

Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration:

The document does not provide details on evidence of high salary or remuneration for the petitioner.

Commercial Successes in the Performing Arts:

The document does not provide details on commercial successes in the performing arts for the petitioner.

Supporting Documentation

The appeal was rejected primarily due to procedural errors, specifically the improper signing of the Form I-290B and the Form G-28, as well as the original Form I-140 petition.

Conclusion

Final Determination:

The appeal was rejected.

Reasoning:

The appeal was rejected because the Form I-290B, Notice of Appeal or Motion, and the Form G-28, Notice of Entry of Appearance of Attorney or Accredited Representative, were signed by the attorney instead of the petitioner. This invalidated the appeal as the regulations require the petitioner to sign these forms personally, except in specific cases where a legal guardian may sign for the petitioner. Additionally, the original Form I-140 petition was not properly signed by the petitioner, which should have resulted in its rejection at the time of filing.

Next Steps:

The petitioner should ensure that all forms are correctly signed by the appropriate parties in future filings. It is crucial to adhere to USCIS signature requirements to avoid similar procedural rejections. The petitioner may consider re-filing the petition with the correct signatures and addressing any other deficiencies noted in the original decision.

Download the Full Petition Review Here

Victor Chibuike
Victor Chibuike

A major in Programming,Cyber security and Content Writing

Articles: 532

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *