EB-1 Extraordinary Ability USCIS Appeal Review – Swimmer and Multisport Athlete from Ukraine – NOV302023_03B2203

Date of Decision: November 30, 2023
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability


Petitioner Information

Profession: Swimmer and Multisport Athlete
Field: Athletics
Nationality: Ukrainian


Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied


Evidentiary Criteria Analysis

Criteria Met:

  1. Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards: The Petitioner demonstrated receipt of lesser awards through his success in Ukrainian national swimming competitions.
  2. Published material about the noncitizen in professional or major trade publications or other major media: The Petitioner provided documentation of media coverage, particularly concerning his long-distance swim in 2011.

Criteria Not Met:

  1. Membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements of their members: The Petitioner failed to show that his Master of Sports of Ukraine certificate constituted membership in an association that requires outstanding achievements for entry.
  2. Original contributions of major significance in the field: The Petitioner did not contest the Director’s finding that he did not meet this criterion.

Key Points from the Decision

Awards and Prizes Won:

  • The Petitioner received various titles in the Ukrainian Unified Sports Classification system, which recognizes athletic achievements.

Published Materials About the Petitioner:

  • Significant media coverage highlighted his long-distance swim, but did not sufficiently demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.

Original Contributions of Major Significance:

  • The Petitioner did not provide evidence supporting original contributions of major significance in his field.

Participation as a Judge:

  • Not applicable.

Membership in Associations:

  • The Petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence that his Master of Sports of Ukraine title granted him membership in relevant associations that require outstanding achievements.

Authorship of Scholarly Articles:

  • Not applicable.

Leading or Critical Role Performed:

  • Not applicable.

Artistic Exhibitions or Showcases:

  • Not applicable.

Evidence of High Salary or Remuneration:

  • Not applicable.

Commercial Successes in the Performing Arts:

  • Not applicable.

Supporting Documentation

  • Master of Sports of Ukraine Certificate: Provided as evidence of membership in associations, but did not meet the required criteria.
  • Media Coverage: Included articles and press releases about his athletic achievements.
  • Competition Records: Documented his participation and success in various national and international competitions.

Conclusion

Final Determination: The appeal is dismissed, and the petition remains denied.

Reasoning:

  • The Petitioner did not meet the required three of ten initial evidentiary criteria.
  • The documentation provided did not demonstrate sustained national or international acclaim.
  • The Petitioner did not show that he belongs to the small percentage at the very top of his field.

Next Steps:

  • The Petitioner may consider submitting additional evidence or seeking legal advice for further action.

Download the Full Petition Review Here

Igbo Clifford
Igbo Clifford

python • technical writing • filmmaking

Articles: 1194

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *