Date of Decision: July 6, 2016
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB1 Extraordinary Ability
Petitioner Information
Profession: Technology Design Director
Field: Business
Nationality: Not specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Approved
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
Published material about the individual:
The Petitioner provided web-based articles featuring him, including a major business news website with significant monthly visits. The articles provided detailed information about his role and accomplishments, meeting the criterion of being about him.
Evidence of participation as a judge:
The Petitioner served as a judge for multiple industry competitions, including the European Internet community awards and contests sponsored by notable organizations, meeting the judging criterion.
Evidence of a leading or critical role:
The Petitioner demonstrated his role as Design Director at a prominent company, overseeing major projects and departments, establishing his critical role in distinguished organizations.
Criteria Not Met:
N/A
Key Points from the Decision
Published Materials About the Petitioner:
- The Petitioner was featured on a major business news website, which qualifies as major media.
- The articles included substantive information about his work and accomplishments.
Participation as a Judge:
- The Petitioner served as a judge for prestigious awards and competitions in his field, demonstrating his recognition as an expert.
Leading or Critical Role Performed:
- The Petitioner held a significant leadership position as Design Director, responsible for major projects and strategic decisions in recognized companies.
Supporting Documentation
- Web-Based Articles: Included detailed profiles and accomplishments of the Petitioner in major business media.
- Judging Participation: Documentation of the Petitioner’s role as a judge in industry-specific competitions.
- Leadership Role Evidence: Proof of the Petitioner’s critical role and responsibilities at leading companies.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal is sustained.
Reasoning: The Petitioner demonstrated extraordinary ability by meeting at least three regulatory criteria and showing sustained national or international acclaim in his field. The evidence established his recognition at the top of his field and his potential benefit to the United States.
Next Steps: The Petitioner’s entry into the United States is deemed to substantially benefit the country, and he has met the eligibility criteria for the EB-1 classification.
