EB-1B Outstanding Professor or Researcher USCIS Appeal Review – Applied Scientist – FEB162017_01B3203

Date of Decision: February 16, 2017
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-1B (Outstanding Professor or Researcher)

Petitioner Information

Profession: Applied Scientist II
Field: Speech Recognition
Nationality: Not Specified

Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Dismissed

Evidentiary Criteria Analysis

Criteria Met:

  • Judging the Work of Others: The beneficiary served as a judge of the work of others in the academic field, participating in peer review for journals and conferences.
  • Original Contributions: The beneficiary made original contributions to the field, particularly in speech recognition and privacy-related issues.
  • Scholarly Articles: The beneficiary authored several scholarly articles, which were published in respected journals.

Criteria Not Met:

  • International Recognition: The evidence did not demonstrate that the beneficiary’s contributions were internationally recognized as outstanding.
  • Offer of Employment: The petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence of a permanent research position being offered.
  • Three Years of Experience: The petitioner failed to adequately document the beneficiary’s three years of postdoctoral research experience.

Key Points from the Decision

Original Contributions of Major Significance: The beneficiary’s work on privacy-preserving features in speech recognition was considered innovative but lacked substantial evidence of international impact.

Participation as a Judge: Although the beneficiary participated in peer reviews for reputable journals and conferences, this activity was deemed routine and not indicative of international recognition.

Membership in Associations: There was no mention of membership in associations that would indicate a level of recognition necessary for this classification.

Authorship of Scholarly Articles: The beneficiary authored scholarly articles; however, the citation and impact were not sufficient to establish international recognition.

Supporting Documentation

  • Reference Letters: Provided by various professionals in the field, these letters attested to the beneficiary’s contributions but lacked specific evidence of international recognition.
  • Citation Data: While citations were provided, they did not demonstrate significant reliance on the beneficiary’s work.

Conclusion

Final Determination: The appeal was dismissed.
Reasoning: The petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence of international recognition, a permanent offer of employment, and the necessary experience for the beneficiary.
Next Steps: The petitioner may consider gathering more comprehensive evidence or exploring other immigration categories that may better align with the beneficiary’s qualifications.

Download the Full Petition Review Here

Izu Okafor
Izu Okafor

Izu Okafor is a filmmaker, project manager, and video editor with a rich background in the film industry. He has refined his craft under the mentorship of industry giants like AMAA VFx Winner Stephen Onaji Onche and AMVCA-winning producer Chris Odeh. Izu is one of 60 participants in the prestigious British Council Film Lab Africa Accelerator Program. His experience spans roles at Sixar Studio, Sozo Films, and Hanuluo Studios, with work on projects like "Wahala" and "Chiugo." He recently produced his debut feature, "Dinobi," which has garnered international festival recognition. Beyond filmmaking, Izu is dedicated to social entrepreneurship and youth empowerment, mentoring future leaders through Uncommon Me International.

Articles: 448

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *