Date of Decision: June 5, 2015
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-1C (Multinational Managers or Executives)
Field of Expertise: Food, Agriculture, Financial, and Industrial Products and Services
Beneficiary Information
Profession: Investment Associate
Field: Food, Agriculture, Financial, and Industrial Products and Services
Nationality: Not Specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Sustained
Case Overview
The petitioner, a Delaware corporation engaged in the production and marketing of food, agriculture, financial, and industrial products and services, sought to employ the beneficiary as an Investment Associate under the EB-1C classification for multinational executives or managers. The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the petitioner did not establish that the beneficiary was employed abroad in a qualifying managerial or executive capacity, nor that the beneficiary would be employed in such a capacity in the United States.
On appeal, the petitioner submitted additional evidence, including an expert opinion letter, disputing the director’s findings. The petitioner demonstrated that the beneficiary was responsible for managing significant investment projects, coordinating the work of professionals, and overseeing external asset managers. The petitioner also provided detailed descriptions of the beneficiary’s duties and the organizational structure supporting his role.
Key Issues
The primary issue on appeal was whether the petitioner provided sufficient evidence to establish that the beneficiary’s roles, both abroad and in the United States, were primarily managerial in nature. The Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) found that the beneficiary’s responsibilities involved managing high-value projects, directing the work of professionals, and exercising substantial discretionary authority over the company’s investment activities. The AAO concluded that the petitioner successfully demonstrated that the beneficiary’s role met the criteria for a qualifying managerial position.
USCIS Findings
The AAO determined that the petitioner met the burden of proof required for the EB-1C classification. The evidence provided by the petitioner established that the beneficiary was employed in a managerial capacity, both abroad and in the United States, within the organization’s investment functions.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner submitted various documents, including detailed job descriptions, organizational charts, and an expert opinion letter. The AAO found these materials sufficient to demonstrate that the beneficiary’s duties were primarily managerial and that the petitioner met the criteria for the EB-1C classification.
Additional Notes
The AAO emphasized the importance of providing detailed and consistent evidence to establish the managerial nature of the beneficiary’s duties. The petitioner’s comprehensive documentation and clear delineation of the beneficiary’s responsibilities contributed to the success of the appeal.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal was sustained. The petitioner successfully established that the beneficiary’s duties in the United States would be primarily managerial in nature.
Download the Full Petition Review Here
