Date of Decision: February 1, 2019
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-1C (Multinational Managers or Executives)
Field of Expertise: Information Technology (IT) Consulting
Beneficiary Information
Profession: Associate Manager
Field: Information Technology (IT) Consulting
Nationality: Not Specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied
Case Overview
The petitioner in this case is an information technology (IT) consulting firm that sought to permanently employ the beneficiary as an associate manager under the EB-1C classification for multinational executives or managers. This classification allows a U.S. employer to transfer a qualified foreign employee to the United States to work in a managerial or executive capacity. The beneficiary had previously been employed by the petitioner in the U.S. and abroad. The petition aimed to establish that the beneficiary had been employed in a managerial capacity while abroad and would continue in a similar role in the U.S.
Key Issues
The primary issue in this case was whether the beneficiary had been employed abroad in a managerial or executive capacity for at least one year during the three years preceding their entry into the United States. The USCIS Director found that the evidence provided did not support the claim that the beneficiary’s role abroad qualified as managerial. Specifically, discrepancies in job titles and a lack of clarity in job descriptions raised doubts about the true nature of the beneficiary’s employment.
USCIS Findings
The USCIS Director determined that the beneficiary’s job abroad did not meet the statutory definition of “managerial capacity.” The job titles and duties provided in the petition were inconsistent, with evidence such as payroll records labeling the beneficiary as a “team lead” rather than a “development lead” or “associate manager.” Furthermore, the Director found that the job descriptions provided did not convincingly demonstrate that the beneficiary’s duties were primarily managerial. As a result, the petition did not satisfy the requirements for the EB-1C classification.
Supporting Evidence
The petition included organizational charts, job descriptions, and payroll documents to support the beneficiary’s claimed managerial role. However, the USCIS found that these documents were insufficient or inconsistent. The organizational chart did not reflect the beneficiary’s claimed role as a development lead, and the payroll documents contradicted the petitioner’s assertions regarding the beneficiary’s job title and responsibilities.
Additional Notes
The USCIS emphasized the importance of clear and consistent evidence when establishing a beneficiary’s eligibility for immigration benefits. Discrepancies in job titles and duties, especially when unsupported by contemporaneous evidence, can significantly undermine a petition. This case highlights the need for petitioners to provide comprehensive and verifiable documentation when seeking to classify employees as multinational managers or executives.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal was dismissed, and the initial denial was upheld. The petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary had been employed in a managerial capacity abroad, as required for the EB-1C classification.
Download the Full Petition Review Here
