Date of Decision: September 23, 2020
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-1C (Multinational Managers or Executives)
Field of Expertise: Executive Management
Beneficiary Information
Profession: Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
Field: Executive Management
Nationality: Brazilian
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied
Case Overview
The petitioner, an importer and wholesale distributor, sought to employ the beneficiary, a Brazilian national, as its Chief Executive Officer (CEO) under the EB-1C classification for multinational executives or managers. This classification allows U.S. employers to transfer qualified foreign executives to the United States to work in an executive capacity. The petitioner asserted that the beneficiary, who was previously employed by a related entity in Brazil, was qualified for this role.
Key Issues
The main issues that led to the denial of the petition were:
- Qualifying Relationship: The USCIS initially questioned whether the petitioner had a qualifying relationship with the beneficiary’s foreign employer. However, this issue was resolved in favor of the petitioner.
- Executive Capacity: The petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a true executive capacity. The job description provided was vague and did not clearly demonstrate that the beneficiary’s duties would primarily be executive in nature.
- Ability to Pay: The petitioner also did not sufficiently prove its ability to pay the beneficiary’s proffered wage of $36,000, as required by the regulations.
USCIS Findings
The USCIS found that the petitioner’s descriptions of the beneficiary’s job duties were overly broad and lacked the necessary detail to establish that the role was executive. The petitioner’s organizational structure and staffing levels were also deemed insufficient to support an executive position, leading to the conclusion that the beneficiary would likely be involved in day-to-day operational tasks, rather than performing executive-level duties. Additionally, the petitioner did not provide adequate financial documentation to demonstrate its ability to pay the beneficiary’s salary from the time of the petition’s filing onward.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner provided various documents, including employment agreements, an organizational chart, payroll records, and a business plan. However, these documents failed to convincingly support the claims made regarding the beneficiary’s executive role and the company’s financial capacity.
Additional Notes
The USCIS noted that while the petitioner had a promising business plan with future hiring goals, the company’s current size and operations did not justify the need for an executive at the time of filing. Moreover, discrepancies in the job descriptions submitted during the process further weakened the petitioner’s case.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal was dismissed as the petitioner did not meet the requirements for employing the beneficiary in an executive capacity and failed to demonstrate the ability to pay the proffered wage.
Download the Full Petition Review Here
