Date of Decision: January 15, 2019
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-1C (Multinational Managers or Executives)
Field of Expertise: Accounting Services
Beneficiary Information
Profession: Chief Executive Officer
Field: Accounting Services
Nationality: Not specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied
Case Overview
In this case, the petitioner, L-&R- Inc., an accounting services provider, sought to employ the beneficiary as its Chief Executive Officer (CEO) under the EB-1C classification for multinational executives or managers. The petitioner aimed to leverage the beneficiary’s extensive experience in managing global operations to lead the company’s expansion in the United States. However, the petition faced multiple challenges, particularly in establishing the beneficiary’s executive role within the U.S.-based operations.
Key Issues
The primary issue in this case revolved around whether the petitioner could substantiate that the beneficiary would be employed in an executive capacity within the United States. The USCIS scrutinized the petitioner’s claim, particularly focusing on the company’s operational structure, staffing, and the nature of the beneficiary’s duties. The petitioner failed to demonstrate that it had the necessary infrastructure or staff to relieve the beneficiary from day-to-day operational tasks, which are not considered executive functions. Additionally, the lack of substantial U.S.-based business activities raised doubts about the actual need for an executive role.
USCIS Findings
The USCIS found that the petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence to prove that the beneficiary would primarily engage in executive duties. The decision highlighted that most of the company’s revenue was generated from services that were actually performed by the petitioner’s foreign affiliate, not by the U.S. entity. Furthermore, the USCIS noted that the petitioner had not maintained consistent business operations in the U.S. and relied heavily on outsourced services and foreign staff, which did not support the claim of employing the beneficiary in an executive capacity.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner submitted additional evidence during the appeal, including job descriptions, organizational charts, and statements outlining the beneficiary’s responsibilities. However, the USCIS found these documents insufficient, as they did not adequately address the lack of U.S.-based staff and the petitioner’s dependence on its foreign affiliate for service delivery. The evidence failed to prove that the petitioner was engaged in systematic and continuous business activities in the United States that would require the beneficiary’s executive oversight.
Additional Notes
The USCIS also noted that the petitioner’s plans for future expansion and hiring were contingent upon the approval of the beneficiary’s permanent residence application. However, such prospective plans do not satisfy the requirement for demonstrating that the beneficiary is currently needed in an executive role.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal was dismissed, affirming the denial of the petition due to the petitioner’s failure to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in an executive capacity and the lack of evidence showing continuous business operations in the U.S.
Download the Full Petition Review Here
