EB-1C USCIS Appeal Review – Chief Executive Officer – JUL102019_01B4203

Date of Decision: July 10, 2019
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-1C (Multinational Managers or Executives)
Field of Expertise: Chief Executive Officer


Beneficiary Information

Profession: Chief Executive Officer
Field: Multinational Executive Management
Nationality: Not specified


Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied


Case Overview

The petitioner, T-D-S- Inc., an operator of an ice cream franchise and an educational products export business, sought to employ the beneficiary as its Chief Executive Officer (CEO) under the EB-1C classification for multinational executives or managers. This visa category allows U.S. employers to transfer qualified foreign employees to the United States to work in an executive or managerial capacity. The petitioner filed the Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker, to support this request.

Key Issues

The case was initially denied on four grounds, three of which were later withdrawn. The primary issue that led to the denial was the petitioner’s failure to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a managerial or executive capacity, as required under the EB-1C classification. The petitioner claimed that the beneficiary would serve as CEO, but USCIS found insufficient evidence to support this assertion, particularly regarding the beneficiary’s job duties and the company’s staffing levels.

USCIS Findings

USCIS determined that the evidence provided by the petitioner did not demonstrate that the beneficiary’s role would be primarily managerial or executive. Despite the petitioner submitting an expert opinion letter and a legal brief to challenge this decision, USCIS found that the opinion did not align with the statutory requirements for a managerial or executive role under U.S. immigration law. The findings emphasized that the company, particularly in its start-up stage, did not present a sufficient organizational structure to support the claim that the beneficiary’s role would meet the qualifications for the EB-1C classification.

Supporting Evidence

The petitioner provided various forms of evidence, including an expert opinion letter and organizational charts. However, USCIS concluded that this evidence was inadequate to establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a managerial or executive capacity. The decision highlighted the deficiencies in the evidence related to the company’s staffing and the nature of the beneficiary’s job duties.

Additional Notes

The USCIS emphasized that the petitioner’s reliance on the company’s status as a start-up was not sufficient to meet the requirements for the EB-1C classification. The regulations require that the beneficiary be employed in a managerial or executive capacity, regardless of the company’s phase of development.


Conclusion

Final Determination: The motion to reopen and reconsider was denied, reaffirming the initial denial of the petition. The petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence to overturn the prior decision.

Download the Full Petition Review Here


Igbo Clifford
Igbo Clifford

python • technical writing • filmmaking

Articles: 1194

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *