Date of Decision: May 26, 2020
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-1C (Multinational Managers or Executives)
Field of Expertise: Logistics and International Trade
Beneficiary Information
Profession: Chief Executive Officer (CEO)
Field: Logistics and International Trade
Nationality: Not Specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied
Case Overview
The Petitioner, a logistics and international trade company, filed an EB-1C petition seeking to permanently employ the Beneficiary as its Chief Executive Officer (CEO). The EB-1C classification is designed for multinational executives or managers, allowing a U.S. employer to transfer a qualified foreign employee to work in an executive or managerial capacity in the United States. The Petitioner claimed that the Beneficiary would be employed in an executive capacity, focusing on developing company policies, making discretionary decisions, and overseeing the company’s overall management.
Key Issues
The primary issues in this case revolved around whether the Petitioner could establish that the Beneficiary would be employed in an executive capacity and whether the company had been doing business for at least one year at the time of filing. The Director’s initial denial focused on the Petitioner’s failure to demonstrate that the Beneficiary would primarily perform executive functions. Furthermore, questions were raised regarding the company’s organizational structure and whether it adequately supported the Beneficiary in an executive role.
USCIS Findings
USCIS concluded that the Petitioner did not meet the burden of proof required to establish that the Beneficiary would be employed in an executive capacity. The agency found that the evidence provided, including organizational charts and job descriptions, did not sufficiently demonstrate that the Beneficiary would be free from performing operational tasks, which are inconsistent with an executive role. Additionally, the USCIS noted that the company’s structure did not support the Beneficiary’s claim of directing the management of the entity as a whole, as the staff available was insufficient for the Beneficiary to focus solely on executive duties.
Supporting Evidence
The Petitioner submitted several pieces of evidence, including organizational charts, job descriptions, and affidavits. However, much of the evidence was repetitive, and no new documentation was provided that would have addressed the deficiencies noted in the initial decision. The evidence did not adequately prove that the Beneficiary’s role was primarily executive in nature, nor did it resolve inconsistencies identified by USCIS in earlier proceedings.
Additional Notes
USCIS emphasized that the Beneficiary’s job duties, as described, were more operational than executive. The Petitioner’s argument that the Beneficiary’s role involved significant discretionary decision-making was not supported by sufficient evidence. Additionally, the company’s business operations and staffing at the time of filing did not align with the claimed executive capacity of the Beneficiary.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The motion to reopen was dismissed, and the denial of the EB-1C petition was upheld due to insufficient evidence that the Beneficiary would be employed in an executive capacity.
Download the Full Petition Review Here
