Date of Decision: March 31, 2016
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-1C (Multinational Managers or Executives)
Field of Expertise: Import, Wholesale, Retail, and Trade Business
Beneficiary Information
Profession: General Manager
Field: Import, Wholesale, Retail, and Trade
Nationality: [Not Specified]
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied
Case Overview
The petitioner, USAF-I-T Corp., an import, wholesale, retail, and trade business, sought to employ the beneficiary permanently as a general manager under the EB-1C classification for multinational executives or managers. This classification permits U.S. employers to transfer a qualified foreign employee to the United States to work in an executive or managerial capacity. However, the petition was denied by the Texas Service Center, leading to an appeal.
Key Issues
The denial was primarily based on two issues:
- The petitioner failed to demonstrate that the beneficiary had been employed for at least one year in a managerial or executive capacity with a qualifying foreign organization within the three years preceding their entry to the United States.
- The petitioner also did not establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a managerial or executive capacity in the United States.
USCIS Findings
Upon reviewing the case, the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) found that the petitioner did not identify any specific erroneous conclusions of law or fact as required. Moreover, the petitioner failed to submit a brief or additional evidence within the stipulated time, despite indicating that such documentation would be provided. As a result, the AAO summarily dismissed the appeal in accordance with 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v).
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner did not submit any additional evidence or documentation with the appeal, and there was no brief provided to support their case. The AAO’s decision to dismiss the appeal was based on the lack of any identified errors in the initial decision and the absence of supporting documentation.
Additional Notes
The AAO’s dismissal highlights the importance of addressing specific legal or factual errors when filing an appeal. In this case, the petitioner’s failure to provide supporting evidence or a clear basis for the appeal resulted in a summary dismissal.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal was summarily dismissed, and the initial decision to deny the petition was upheld.
Download the Full Petition Review Here
