Date of Decision: MAY 24, 2021
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-1C (Multinational Managers or Executives)
Field of Expertise: Grain Dealer and Processor
Beneficiary Information
Profession: General Manager
Field: Grain Dealer and Processor
Nationality: Mexican
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied
Case Overview
The petitioner, a grain dealer, processor, and exporter, sought to permanently employ the beneficiary as its General Manager under the EB-1C classification for multinational executives or managers. The petitioner operates within an integrated enterprise consisting of four grain processing plants in Mexico and one in Texas. The petition was filed to transfer the beneficiary, who had been employed in Mexico, to the United States to work in a managerial or executive capacity.
Key Issues
The primary issues in this case were whether the beneficiary would be employed in a managerial or executive capacity in the United States and whether the petitioner’s U.S. operations were adequately staffed to support such a position. The USCIS questioned the job description provided, noting that it lacked sufficient detail and did not convincingly demonstrate that the beneficiary’s role would primarily involve managerial or executive duties. Additionally, the USCIS found discrepancies in the staffing structure and questioned whether the U.S. operations were capable of supporting the beneficiary in the intended role.
USCIS Findings
USCIS concluded that the petitioner failed to provide adequate evidence that the beneficiary would be employed in a managerial or executive capacity. The job description provided by the petitioner was vague, lacked specific percentages of time allocated to various duties, and did not clarify which tasks were managerial or executive in nature. Furthermore, the petitioner’s U.S. operations appeared understaffed, raising concerns about whether the beneficiary would be primarily engaged in non-managerial tasks.
Supporting Evidence
Key evidence included organizational charts, job descriptions, and wage and tax documents. However, USCIS found this evidence insufficient to establish that the beneficiary’s role would be primarily managerial or executive. The petitioner also referenced previous decisions, such as Matter of Z-A-, to argue for consideration of the entire integrated enterprise, but USCIS found the petitioner’s circumstances were not comparable to those cases.
Additional Notes
USCIS emphasized the importance of providing detailed job descriptions and clear evidence of the managerial or executive nature of the beneficiary’s duties. The decision also highlighted the need for petitioners to demonstrate that their U.S. operations are adequately staffed to relieve the beneficiary from non-qualifying tasks.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The USCIS affirmed the denial of the petition, concluding that the petitioner did not establish that the beneficiary would be employed in a managerial or executive capacity in the United States.
Download the Full Petition Review Here
