Date of Decision: August 20, 2020
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-1C (Multinational Managers or Executives)
Field of Expertise: Manufacturing (Soaps and Air Fresheners)
Beneficiary Information
Profession: President and Chief Executive Officer
Field: Manufacturing (Soaps and Air Fresheners)
Nationality: Not Specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Approved
Case Overview
The petitioner is a company specializing in the manufacturing of soaps and air fresheners, seeking to permanently employ the beneficiary as its President and Chief Executive Officer under the EB-1C classification for multinational executives or managers. The petition was initially denied by the Texas Service Center on four grounds, which prompted the petitioner to file a motion to reopen and reconsider. The matter was subsequently brought before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO), which initially dismissed the appeal. However, upon further review through a combined motion to reopen and reconsider, the petition was granted, and the appeal was sustained.
Key Issues
The primary issues leading to the initial denial included failure to establish a qualifying relationship between the U.S. and foreign entities, insufficient evidence of the beneficiary’s managerial or executive capacity, and a lack of eligibility for the requested immigration benefit. These grounds were critical in the USCIS’s decision to deny the petition.
USCIS Findings
The USCIS and the AAO, upon initial review, found that the petitioner failed to provide adequate documentation to prove the beneficiary’s managerial role and the qualifying relationship between the petitioning company and its foreign affiliate. These findings were based on specific regulations under the Immigration and Nationality Act and previous precedents. However, in the subsequent motion to reopen and reconsider, new facts and legal arguments were presented that met the burden of proof, leading to the approval of the appeal.
Supporting Evidence
Key evidence that influenced the final decision included detailed organizational charts, employment agreements, and additional documentation demonstrating the beneficiary’s executive role within the company. The evidence successfully addressed the concerns raised in the initial denial and provided sufficient grounds for the appeal to be sustained.
Additional Notes
The case highlights the importance of comprehensive documentation in establishing eligibility for multinational executive classifications under the EB-1C category. The decision underscores the significance of presenting new facts and legal arguments in motions to reopen and reconsider, particularly when challenging initial denials.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal is sustained, and the petition for the beneficiary to be classified as a multinational manager or executive is approved.
Download the Full Petition Review Here
