EB-1C USCIS Appeal Review – President – APR272021_01B4203

Date of Decision: APR. 27, 2021
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-1C (Multinational Managers or Executives)
Field of Expertise: Business Management

Beneficiary Information

Profession: President
Field: Business Management
Nationality: [Not specified]

Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Remanded

Case Overview

The petitioner, a trucking company, filed a petition seeking to employ the beneficiary as its president under the EB-1C classification for multinational executives or managers. The primary goal was to facilitate the beneficiary’s continued role in an executive capacity within the United States, aligning with the company’s business operations and management strategies.

Key Issues

The primary issues leading to the initial denial of the petition included the petitioner’s failure to demonstrate that it had been conducting business for at least one year before the filing date. Additionally, the USCIS questioned whether the beneficiary would be employed in an executive capacity as claimed, due to inconsistencies in staffing levels and the nature of the beneficiary’s proposed duties.

USCIS Findings

The USCIS and the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) found that the petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence to establish the ongoing business activities for the required duration. Furthermore, the petitioner’s documentation failed to clearly demonstrate that the beneficiary’s role would primarily involve executive-level responsibilities, as defined by the relevant immigration laws. Concerns were also raised about the consistency of the company’s employee records and the beneficiary’s involvement in day-to-day operations.

Supporting Evidence

In an attempt to support its motion to reopen, the petitioner provided additional documentation, including business invoices and bank statements, which aimed to prove that the company had been conducting business for more than a year before the petition filing date. Despite this, the evidence provided was deemed insufficient to address the concerns related to the beneficiary’s executive capacity and the company’s staffing levels.

Additional Notes

The case was remanded to the Texas Service Center for further review, with instructions to the petitioner to provide detailed job descriptions, updated organizational charts, and evidence of the company’s payroll and staffing during the relevant periods. The USCIS also emphasized the need for clear documentation proving the beneficiary’s role in the executive capacity and the company’s ability to sustain such a position.

Conclusion

Final Determination: The case has been remanded for further consideration, pending additional evidence and clarification from the petitioner.

Download the Full Petition Review Here


Igbo Stanford
Igbo Stanford

AI enthusiast, writer, and web designer.

Articles: 682

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *