Date of Decision: October 8, 2019
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-1C (Multinational Managers or Executives)
Field of Expertise: Executive Management
Petitioner Information
Profession: President
Field: Executive Management
Nationality: Not Specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied
Case Overview
The petitioner, K-S-A- Inc., a day care center, sought to permanently employ the beneficiary as its president under the first preference immigrant classification for multinational executives or managers (EB-1). The classification allows a U.S. employer to transfer a qualified foreign employee to the United States to work in an executive or managerial capacity. The petitioner argued that the beneficiary had been employed in such a capacity while on an L-1A visa and would continue in a similar role upon approval of the petition.
Key Issues
The primary issue in this case was whether the petitioner could establish that the beneficiary would be employed in the United States in an executive capacity. The director found that the petitioner did not sufficiently demonstrate that the beneficiary’s duties would be primarily executive in nature rather than operational. The appeal raised the question of whether the director had improperly applied the standards for managerial capacity instead of executive capacity, as the petitioner asserted that it sought to employ the beneficiary solely in an executive capacity.
USCIS Findings
The USCIS and Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) found that the petitioner’s description of the beneficiary’s duties did not meet the statutory definition of “executive capacity.” Although the beneficiary held a high-level position with authority over significant business decisions, the evidence showed that the duties included many operational tasks rather than executive-level responsibilities. Additionally, the petitioner’s organizational structure was insufficiently complex to support the need for a full-time executive role, with most of the staff being directly involved in day-to-day operations.
Supporting Evidence
Key evidence considered included the organizational chart, job descriptions, and the nature of the petitioner’s business. The petitioner provided descriptions of the beneficiary’s activities, such as launching a franchise, adopting e-commerce strategies, and outsourcing non-core business tasks. However, the USCIS found that these tasks did not sufficiently demonstrate that the beneficiary’s role was primarily executive, as opposed to operational or administrative. Additionally, the business plan submitted on appeal was deemed to lack credibility due to discrepancies in the staffing descriptions and the qualifications of subordinate employees.
Additional Notes
The USCIS emphasized the importance of demonstrating that the beneficiary’s duties are primarily of an executive nature. Simply holding a title or having discretionary authority is not sufficient; the petitioner must show that the beneficiary’s daily activities align with the executive capacity as defined by law. The case highlighted the need for detailed and credible documentation of the beneficiary’s role and the petitioner’s organizational structure.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal was dismissed. The petitioner did not meet the burden of proof to establish that the beneficiary’s duties were primarily executive in nature.
Download the Full Petition Review Here
