Date of Decision: April 4, 2019
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-1C (Multinational Managers or Executives)
Field of Expertise: Road and Highway Contracting
Beneficiary Information
Profession: Vice President of Operations
Field: Road and Highway Contracting
Nationality: Not Specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Approved
Case Overview
The petitioner in this case is a road and highway contracting company with 372 employees. They filed a petition to permanently employ the beneficiary, who currently holds the position of Vice President of Operations, under the EB-1C classification for multinational executives or managers. The specific immigration benefit sought was to transfer the beneficiary to the United States to work in a managerial capacity, leveraging his extensive experience in managing both personnel and critical business functions.
Key Issues
The primary issue leading to the initial denial was the USCIS Director’s conclusion that the petitioner failed to establish that the beneficiary was employed in a managerial capacity both abroad and in the United States. The Director raised concerns regarding whether the beneficiary had adequately delegated operational tasks to other company employees, focusing on the necessity for the beneficiary to manage employees as a qualifying duty. The Director also questioned the scope of the beneficiary’s managerial duties during the three-year period preceding the filing of the petition.
USCIS Findings
Upon review, the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) identified several errors in the Director’s analysis. Notably, the AAO found that the Director did not fully consider the evidence showing that the beneficiary’s U.S. position involved managing other managerial employees. Additionally, the AAO noted that the Director did not consider the entirety of the beneficiary’s three-year employment period abroad, during which the beneficiary held successive managerial roles, including the management of the integration function for newly acquired entities. The AAO concluded that the petitioner provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the beneficiary’s roles were indeed managerial and that he would not primarily perform non-managerial duties.
Supporting Evidence
Key evidence supporting the appeal included detailed job descriptions of the beneficiary’s subordinates, organizational charts illustrating the company’s reporting structures, and documentation of the beneficiary’s critical role in managing the integration function during the foreign employment period. This evidence was pivotal in demonstrating that the beneficiary’s positions, both abroad and in the U.S., met the statutory requirements of managerial capacity.
Additional Notes
The AAO emphasized the importance of a thorough and accurate analysis of all submitted evidence when assessing a beneficiary’s managerial capacity. The appeal’s success underscores the necessity for petitioners to provide comprehensive documentation that clearly outlines the managerial responsibilities and reporting structures associated with the beneficiary’s roles.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal was sustained, and the petition was approved, allowing the beneficiary to be employed in the U.S. under the EB-1C classification.
Download the Full Petition Review Here
