EB-2 NIW USCIS Appeal Review – Application Manager – NOV042022_03B5203

Date of Decision: November 04, 2022
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW)
Field of Expertise: Information Technology

Petitioner Information

Profession: Application Manager
Field: Information Technology
Nationality: Not specified

Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied

Evidentiary Criteria Analysis

Criteria Met:

  • Advanced Degree: The petitioner has a U.S. master’s degree.
  • Exceptional Ability: The petitioner demonstrated technical acumen and IT skills.

Criteria Not Met:

  • National Importance: The proposed endeavor’s national impact was not established.
  • Economic Impact: Insufficient evidence of a substantial positive economic effect or job creation.

Key Points from the Decision

Proposed Endeavor:

The petitioner proposed to continue working as an application manager to boost productivity and capital through technological adaptation.

Substantial Merit and National Importance:

While the IT field is recognized as important, the petitioner did not demonstrate how his specific endeavor would have a national impact beyond his employers.

On balance, it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the requirements of the Labor Certification process:

The petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence to support claims of substantial economic impact or significant job creation.

Supporting Evidence:

The petitioner provided articles and reports on the IT worker shortage and cybersecurity needs, as well as letters of recommendation highlighting his technical skills and achievements.

Inconsistencies in Proposed Endeavor:

The evidence did not convincingly connect the petitioner’s proposed endeavor to a broader national impact.

Supporting Documentation

Letters of Intent:

The letters praised the petitioner’s technical skills but did not establish the national importance of his proposed work.

Business Plan:

Not applicable.

Advisory Letter:

Included letters that supported the petitioner’s technical skills but lacked evidence of national impact.

Conclusion

Final Determination: The appeal was denied.
Reasoning: The petitioner did not demonstrate that his proposed endeavor had national importance or would significantly impact the U.S. economy or job market.

Download the Full Petition Review Here


Igbo Stanford
Igbo Stanford

AI enthusiast, writer, and web designer.

Articles: 682

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *