EB-2 NIW USCIS Appeal Review – Consultant – NOV242017_01B5203

Date of Decision: November 24, 2017

Service Center: Texas Service Center

Form Type: Form I-140

Case Type: EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW)

Field of Expertise: Information Technology Development and Consulting Services

Petitioner Information

Profession: Consultant

Field: Information Technology

Nationality: [Not Specified]

Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied

Appeal Outcome: Withdrawn and Remanded

Evidentiary Criteria Analysis

Criteria Met:

None identified as met.

Criteria Not Met:

Ability to Pay Proffered Wage: The Petitioner did not demonstrate the ability to pay the combined proffered wages of this and other petitions filed that remained pending or approved.

Documentation Requirements: The Petitioner failed to provide sufficient financial documentation to prove its ability to pay the proffered wage.

Key Points from the Decision

Proposed Endeavor:

The Beneficiary was to be employed as a Consultant, providing information technology development and consulting services.

Substantial Merit and National Importance:

Ability to Pay: The Director concluded that the Petitioner did not demonstrate its ability to pay the combined proffered wages of this and other pending or approved petitions.

Financial Documentation: The Petitioner did not provide required financial documents such as annual reports, federal income tax returns, or audited financial statements to support its claim of ability to pay.

Supporting Evidence:

Wage and Tax Statement: The Petitioner submitted an IRS Form W-2 indicating payment of $80,359.70 to the Beneficiary in 2016, which did not meet the proffered wage of $113,235.

Additional Financial Evidence: The required financial evidence for 2016 was not available at the time of the initial decision but should be attainable for further proceedings.

Inconsistencies in Proposed Endeavor:

Proffered Wage Payments: The Petitioner paid the Beneficiary less than the proffered wage in 2016, necessitating a demonstration of ability to pay the combined proffered wages of this and other petitions.

Supporting Documentation

Letters of Intent: Not provided.

Business Plan: Not provided.

Advisory Letter: Not provided.

Any Other Supporting Documentation: Not provided.

Conclusion

Final Determination: The appeal was withdrawn and the case was remanded for further proceedings.

Reasoning: The Petitioner did not demonstrate its ability to pay the proffered wage with the available financial documentation. The Director is to request additional evidence and review the entire record to make a new decision.

Download the Full Petition Review Here

Gabriel
Gabriel

Programmer. Author. Python

Articles: 251

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *