Date of Decision: April 04, 2024
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW)
Field of Expertise: Computational Science
Petitioner Information
Profession: Data Scientist/Researcher
Field: Information Science
Nationality: Not specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Remanded
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
- Advanced Degree Professional: The petitioner qualified as an advanced degree professional, holding a master’s degree in computational science.
- Well-Positioned to Advance Proposed Endeavor: The petitioner demonstrated capability and readiness to advance the proposed endeavor of ethical AI framework development.
Criteria Not Met:
- National Importance of Proposed Endeavor: Initially, the director concluded that the petitioner did not demonstrate that her endeavor had substantial potential to impact the U.S. economy or was of national importance.
Key Points from the Decision
Proposed Endeavor:
The petitioner aims to research and develop ethical frameworks for AI, focusing on fairness, transparency, privacy, and algorithm bias to guide AI developers.
Substantial Merit and National Importance:
The endeavor was recognized for its substantial merit, but initially failed to show national importance based on economic impact, despite the broader potential impact on ethical AI development being critical.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner provided a range of supporting documents including personal statements, law and executive orders on AI, expert letters from university professors, and citations of strategic plans highlighting the importance of ethical AI frameworks.
Inconsistencies in Proposed Endeavor
The initial review failed to acknowledge the full scope of the national importance of the petitioner’s endeavor, focusing narrowly on direct economic impacts rather than broader contributions to ethical standards in AI development.
Supporting Documentation
Letters of Intent:
Included references to ongoing research commitments from academic and professional entities.
Advisory Letter:
Letters from professors supported the significance and prospective impact of the petitioner’s work.
Other Supporting Documentation:
Included legislative and strategic documents underscoring the importance of ethical AI development.
Conclusion
The appeal highlighted deficiencies in the initial review’s recognition of the national importance of the petitioner’s endeavor. The case was remanded for a more comprehensive evaluation of the evidence and potential impacts on science and technology.
Download the Full Petition Review Here
