Date of Decision: April 4, 2024
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW)
Field of Expertise: Electrical and Computer Engineering
Petitioner Information
Profession: Researcher
Field: Electrical and Computer Engineering
Nationality: Pakistani
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Remanded
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
- Substantial Merit: The proposed endeavor involves significant contributions to wireless communication and cybersecurity.
- Well Positioned to Advance: Demonstrated through consistent work as a researcher and academic positions.
Criteria Not Met:
- National Importance: The Director initially found the endeavor lacked national importance, a point not sufficiently justified or detailed in the decision.
Key Points from the Decision
Proposed Endeavor:
The petitioner focuses on wireless communication, cybersecurity, and AI tools for healthcare, highlighting significant potential impacts in these critical areas.
Substantial Merit and National Importance:
The decision noted substantial merit but failed to properly articulate the national importance. The appeal stresses the need for a more detailed analysis, noting the global implications of the petitioner’s work in the field.
Supporting Evidence:
Evidence included government grant funding and positions held, indicating recognition and endorsement of the petitioner’s work and its importance.
Inconsistencies in Proposed Endeavor:
The decision was criticized for its lack of coherent analysis and failure to fully consider the evidence provided, particularly in how it supports the national interest.
Supporting Documentation
Letters of Intent:
Not discussed in the decision, requiring further detailed examination upon remand.
Business Plan:
Not applicable as the petitioner is in an academic and research position.
Advisory Letter:
Not detailed in the decision; requires clarification and emphasis on the impact of the petitioner’s work.
Conclusion
The final determination was to remand the case due to insufficient explanation of the denial reasons. The appeal highlights the need for a more thorough consideration of how the petitioner’s contributions align with national interests.
Download the Full Petition Review Here
