EB-2 NIW USCIS Appeal Review – Entrepreneur from Brazil – JAN112024_09B5203

Date of Decision: JAN. 11, 2024
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW)
Field of Expertise: Beauty Industry

Petitioner Information

Profession: Entrepreneur
Field: Beauty Industry
Nationality: Brazilian

Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied

Evidentiary Criteria Analysis

Criteria Met:

  • Possessing at least ten years of full-time experience in the occupation
  • Possessing a license to practice the profession

Criteria Not Met:

  • Official academic record from a qualifying institution
  • Evidence of salary demonstrating exceptional ability
  • Membership in professional associations
  • Recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry

Key Points from the Decision

Proposed Endeavor:
The petitioner proposed to establish and operate hair salons in Florida and New York.

Substantial Merit and National Importance:
The review did not reach a conclusion on the national interest waiver due to the failure to meet the eligibility criteria for the EB-2 classification.

Supporting Evidence:
The petitioner provided evidence of over ten years of experience, a cosmetology license, and financial documents showing income from salon operations. However, the evidence of exceptional ability and significant contributions to the field was found insufficient.

Inconsistencies in Proposed Endeavor:
There were no specific inconsistencies noted in the proposed endeavor, but the petitioner failed to establish eligibility based on the required criteria.

Supporting Documentation

Letters of Intent:
Not applicable.

Business Plan:
Not applicable.

Advisory Letter:
Not applicable.

Any other supporting documentation:
Not applicable.

Conclusion

Final Determination:
The petitioner did not meet the required criteria to qualify as an individual of exceptional ability in the beauty industry and thus was not eligible for the EB-2 National Interest Waiver.

Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to satisfy three of the six regulatory criteria necessary for demonstrating exceptional ability, notably lacking in academic qualifications, professional recognition, and documented professional achievements relative to industry standards.

Download the Full Petition Review Here


Igbo Clifford
Igbo Clifford

python • technical writing • filmmaking

Articles: 1194

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *