EB-2 NIW USCIS Appeal Review – Member of Professions Holding an Advanced Degree – JAN042024_05B5203

Date of Decision: January 4, 2024
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW)
Field of Expertise: [Field Not Specified]

Petitioner Information

Profession: Member of Professions Holding an Advanced Degree
Field: [Field Not Specified]
Nationality: [Not Specified]

Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied

Evidentiary Criteria Analysis

Criteria Met:

  • Criterion 1: [Not Met] The petitioner did not demonstrate that her proposed endeavor extends beyond her company or its clientele to impact the industry or the field more broadly at a national level.
  • Criterion 2: [Not Met] The petitioner did not demonstrate that her employment and revenue projections reflect significant potential to employ U.S. workers or offer substantial positive economic effects nationally.

Criteria Not Met:

  • Criterion 1: National Importance: The petitioner failed to establish that her proposed endeavor impacts the industry or the field at a level of national importance.
  • Criterion 2: Substantial Merit: The revenue projections and employment potential were not found credible or substantial enough to justify a national interest waiver.

Key Points from the Decision

Proposed Endeavor:

  • The petitioner proposed an endeavor that primarily benefits her own company and its direct clientele without showing a broader impact on the industry or field at the national level.

Substantial Merit and National Importance:

  • The petitioner’s claims of substantial merit and national importance were not supported adequately by credible employment and revenue projections. The review highlighted a lack of significant impact on national employment or economic conditions.

Supporting Evidence:

  • The evidence provided, including business projections and employment plans, was deemed insufficient to demonstrate the national importance and substantial merit required for the NIW.

Inconsistencies in Proposed Endeavor:

  • The appeal highlighted inconsistencies in the petitioner’s claims about the scope and impact of her endeavor, noting a lack of detailed, credible evidence to support her assertions.

Supporting Documentation

Letters of Intent: (if applicable)

  • [Not Mentioned]
    Business Plan: (if applicable)
  • [Not Mentioned]
    Advisory Letter: (if applicable)
  • [Not Mentioned]
    Any other supporting documentation: (if applicable)
  • [Not Mentioned]

Conclusion

Final Determination: The motions to reopen and reconsider were dismissed due to insufficient evidence to meet the required legal standards and criteria for an EB-2 National Interest Waiver. The appeal remains dismissed, and the underlying petition denied.


Reasoning:

  • The final determination was based on the petitioner’s failure to adequately demonstrate how her endeavor meets the national interest standards as required, and a lack of new, compelling evidence to justify reconsideration or reopening of the case.

Download the Full Petition Review Here


Igbo Clifford
Igbo Clifford

python • technical writing • filmmaking

Articles: 1194

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *