EB-2 NIW USCIS Appeal Review – Pediatric Dentist – JUL212022_01B5203

Date of Decision: July 21, 2022
Service Center: Nebraska Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW)
Field of Expertise: Pediatric Dentistry

Petitioner Information

Profession: Pediatric Dentist
Field: Dentistry
Nationality: Not Specified

Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Remanded

Evidentiary Criteria Analysis

Criteria Met:

Substantial Merit and National Importance:
The Petitioner submitted sufficient evidence to establish that the work in pediatric dentistry has substantial merit and national importance.

Criteria Not Met:

Well Positioned to Advance the Proposed Endeavor:
The Director concluded that the Petitioner did not establish being well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor in pediatric dentistry.

On Balance, Beneficial to Waive Labor Certification:
The Director found that the Petitioner did not demonstrate that waiving the job offer and labor certification requirements would be beneficial to the United States.

Key Points from the Decision

Proposed Endeavor:

The Petitioner’s proposed endeavor involves advancements and contributions in the field of pediatric dentistry.

Substantial Merit and National Importance:

The work in pediatric dentistry was acknowledged to have substantial merit and national importance.

On Balance, it would be beneficial to the United States to waive the requirements of the Labor Certification process:

The Director did not find sufficient evidence that waiving the labor certification would be beneficial on balance. The matter was not adequately addressed in the initial decision.

Supporting Evidence

Letters of Intent:
Provided evidence of intent to work and contribute to the field of pediatric dentistry.

Business Plan:
Outlined the goals and future contributions in pediatric dentistry.

Advisory Letter:
Included supportive letters from experts in the field.

Inconsistencies in Proposed Endeavor

The Director noted inconsistencies between the initially mentioned field of physics (astrophysicist) and the actual field of pediatric dentistry.

Supporting Documentation

Letters of Intent:

Detailed intent to work in pediatric dentistry and contribute to the field.

Business Plan:

Outlined strategic plans and expected contributions to pediatric dentistry.

Advisory Letter:

Provided expert opinions and endorsements of the petitioner’s work and contributions.

Conclusion

Final Determination: The appeal was remanded. The Director’s decision was withdrawn, and the matter was remanded for further analysis consistent with the substantial merit and national importance of the proposed endeavor in pediatric dentistry.

Reasoning:
The initial decision failed to adequately address the proposed endeavor’s substantial merit and national importance in pediatric dentistry. Therefore, a new decision is required.

Download the Full Petition Review Here


Igbo Stanford
Igbo Stanford

AI enthusiast, writer, and web designer.

Articles: 682

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *