EB-2 NIW USCIS Appeal Review – Physical Therapist and Aesthetician – APR222024_03B5203

Date of Decision: April 22, 2024
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW)
Field of Expertise: Physical Therapy and Aesthetics

Petitioner Information

Profession: Physical Therapist and Aesthetician
Field: Physical Therapy and Aesthetics
Nationality: Not Specified

Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Denied

Evidentiary Criteria Analysis

Criteria Met:

  • Official Academic Record: The Petitioner holds a degree.
  • License: The Petitioner possesses a license to practice the profession.

Criteria Not Met:

  • 10 Years of Full-Time Experience: The evidence did not establish 10 years of full-time employment in the proposed occupation.
  • Membership in Professional Associations: The association membership did not meet the professional criteria.
  • Recognition for Achievements and Significant Contributions: The evidence provided did not demonstrate significant contributions or recognition in the field.

Key Points from the Decision

Proposed Endeavor:
The Petitioner proposed to work as a physical therapist and aesthetician, but the documentation did not substantiate a well-defined, substantial endeavor.

Substantial Merit and National Importance:
The Director found that the proposed endeavor lacked substantial merit and national importance. The evidence did not demonstrate that the endeavor would benefit the U.S. on a national scale.

Supporting Evidence:
The Petitioner provided various letters of recommendation, membership cards, and a special tribute from a local community. However, these were insufficient to establish eligibility for exceptional ability or national interest waiver.

Inconsistencies in Proposed Endeavor:
There were inconsistencies in the Petitioner’s employment history and the nature of the self-employment claims. These inconsistencies undermined the credibility of the presented evidence.

Supporting Documentation

Letters of Intent:
Not applicable.

Business Plan:
Not applicable.

Advisory Letter:
Not applicable.

Any Other Supporting Documentation:
Letters of recommendation from clients and co-workers, and a special tribute from a local community.

Conclusion

The appeal was dismissed. The Petitioner did not establish eligibility for the underlying EB-2 classification as an individual of exceptional ability and did not meet the requirements for a national interest waiver.

Download the Full Petition Review Here


Igbo Clifford
Igbo Clifford

python • technical writing • filmmaking

Articles: 1194

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *