Date of Decision: June 7, 2017
Service Center: Texas Service Center
Form Type: Form I-140
Case Type: EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW)
Field of Expertise: Molecular Biology/Cardiovascular Disease Research
Petitioner Information
Profession: Researcher
Field: Molecular Biology/Cardiovascular Disease Research
Nationality: Not Specified
Summary of Decision
Initial Decision: Denied
Appeal Outcome: Sustained
Evidentiary Criteria Analysis
Criteria Met:
The Beneficiary holds a PhD in physiology, equivalent to an advanced degree in the United States.
The Beneficiary has demonstrated a record of research success and contributions to the field of cardiovascular disease treatment.
Criteria Not Met:
None. The appeal was sustained as all criteria were met upon further review.
Key Points from the Decision
Proposed Endeavor:
The Petitioner seeks to continue researching molecular treatments for cardiovascular disease, focusing on developing innovative therapies and understanding new pathways to induce endothelial nitric oxide release, which is crucial for cardiovascular health.
Substantial Merit and National Importance:
The proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance due to its potential to improve cardiovascular disease treatments. Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of death globally, and advancements in this field could significantly impact public health and reduce healthcare costs. The Petitioner’s research aims to develop novel therapeutic strategies and pharmacological interventions, which could benefit numerous patients and advance medical knowledge.
Supporting Evidence:
The Petitioner provided evidence of extensive research experience, numerous peer-reviewed publications, and high citation rates. Letters from colleagues and independent researchers attested to the significance of the Petitioner’s work and its influence on the field of cardiovascular medicine. The Petitioner’s methods and findings have been widely adopted and cited by other researchers, demonstrating their impact and relevance.
Inconsistencies in Proposed Endeavor:
No inconsistencies were noted regarding the proposed endeavor. The primary focus was on the significance and impact of the Petitioner’s research, which was well-documented and supported by independent evaluations.
Supporting Documentation
Letters of Intent: Not applicable.
Business Plan: Not applicable.
Advisory Letter: Letters from colleagues and independent researchers attesting to the significance and impact of the Petitioner’s research.
Any other supporting documentation: Numerous peer-reviewed publications, citation records, and evidence of research funding and collaboration.
Conclusion
Final Determination: The appeal is sustained.
Reasoning: The Petitioner successfully demonstrated that the proposed endeavor has substantial merit and national importance, and that the Petitioner is well-positioned to advance this research. The evidence provided showed a strong record of research success, significant contributions to the field, and wide recognition by peers. The Petitioner’s work addresses critical issues in cardiovascular disease treatment and has the potential to benefit public health significantly. Therefore, it is in the national interest to waive the job offer requirement and grant the EB-2 NIW classification.
