EB-2 NIW USCIS Appeal Review – Speech Language Pathologist – MAR012019_01B5203

Date of Decision: March 1, 2019

Service Center: Nebraska Service Center

Form Type: Form I-140

Case Type: EB-2 National Interest Waiver (NIW)

Field of Expertise: Speech Language Pathology

Petitioner Information

Profession: Speech Language Pathologist

Field: Speech Language Pathology

Nationality: Not specified

Summary of Decision

Initial Decision: Denied

Appeal Outcome: Denied

Evidentiary Criteria Analysis

Criteria Met:

Educational Equivalence: The Beneficiary’s qualifications were reviewed and deemed to meet the requirements of an advanced degree professional as per the Immigration and Nationality Act.

Criteria Not Met:

Master’s Degree Equivalence: The evaluation provided did not convincingly establish that the Beneficiary’s foreign educational credentials were equivalent to a U.S. master’s degree.

Ability to Pay Proffered Wage: The Petitioner did not provide sufficient evidence of the ability to pay the offered wage in 2017 or thereafter.

Key Points from the Decision

Proposed Endeavor:
The Petitioner sought to employ the Beneficiary as a speech language pathologist, a position requiring a U.S. master’s degree or foreign equivalent in speech language pathology.

Substantial Merit and National Importance:
The Petitioner did not sufficiently demonstrate that the Beneficiary’s qualifications were equivalent to the required U.S. master’s degree. Despite the Beneficiary holding a foreign master’s degree and New York licensure, the documentation did not adequately prove it was equivalent to a U.S. master’s degree.

Supporting Evidence:
The Petitioner provided an independent evaluation of the Beneficiary’s foreign degrees and documented her New York state licensure and certifications from the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). However, these did not specify her possession of a single degree equivalent to a U.S. master’s degree.

Inconsistencies in Proposed Endeavor:
The provided evaluation equated the Beneficiary’s bachelor’s degree, including an internship, to 111 U.S. credits, short of the typical 120 credits required for a U.S. bachelor’s degree. Additionally, the graduate program did not require a four-year bachelor’s degree for entry.

Supporting Documentation

Letters of Intent: Not applicable

Business Plan: Not applicable

Advisory Letter: Not applicable

Any other supporting documentation: The Beneficiary’s New York licensure and ASHA certifications were provided, but lacked detailed evidence supporting equivalence to a U.S. master’s degree.

Conclusion

Final Determination: The appeal was dismissed.

Reasoning:
The Beneficiary’s foreign educational credentials did not convincingly equate to a U.S. master’s degree. Furthermore, the Petitioner failed to demonstrate the ability to pay the proffered wage for the position in 2017 and thereafter, as required by regulations.

Download the Full Petition Review Here

Victor Chibuike
Victor Chibuike

A major in Programming,Cyber security and Content Writing

Articles: 532

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *